Comment on this post

Urban blight and legalized public corruption

It was nearly 25 years ago that then state Attorney General, John Van de Kamp, told me the politicians had written California’s public corruption laws in such a way that only a politician stupid enough to stand up in public — or get caught on camera _ and admit he took money and did favors could be convicted of a crime.

The politicial culture of L.A. has thrived on that carefully sculpted loophole for years, Our elected officials give access to special interests they don’t give the general public, do favors that sometimes are worth tens of millions of dollars and sell out the public interest for contributions to their campaigns and officeholder accounts — if nothing else.

L.A. is corrupt in a way and on a scale that goes far beyond what goes on in Chicago or New York where politicians often go to jail but the system works to make those cities better — not worse.

A prime example was back in the news today in the L.A. Times  where Ted Rohrlich followed up on the long-running scandal involving well-connected developer Chris Hammond and the Santa Barbara Plaza project near Baldwin Hills.

The plaza was a rundown center with 20 shops and Hammond — with the generous help of Mayor James Hahn — put together a plan for a $123 million redevelopment called Marlton Square. It was to be a housing and retail project with $43 million in public subsidies.

The Daily News exposed the shenanigans in an an article by Harrison Sheppard which discussed Hahn’s hope to win votes in South Los Angeles with his no-questions-asked support.

Even by that time, Hammond had bundled tens of thousands of dollars into politicians’ coffers despite a record of bouncing checks on his own accounts. He had close ties to most of the area’s black politicians, including Herb Wesson, Bernard Parks and Mark Ridley-Thomas among others.

Because Hammond had such strong political support, the project got approved even though there was critical news coverage, a critical audit and criticism from the city’s watchdog, Controller Laura Chick.

Insiders say Hammond was smooth and made big committments to campaigns and nonprofits, and even his bad checks. never stopped fundraisers from putting him high on their lists of targets for money.

Hammond’s story is the story of how City Hall works, or rather doesn’t work for the benefit of the city.

Hammond bought influence, the politicians gave him what he wanted, which was public money and Santa Barbara Plaza is just the way it was years ago — except even more run down, a cancer in the community.

Did Hammond get in trouble wth the law? No.

Did any of the politicians who did him favors for money for their campaigns. No.

Were crimes committed? No.

Is this corruption? Yes.

And it is still going on every day. Follow the money and you will see how and why your elected officials aren’t serving you and why they back projects that are bad for your community and why they are constantly taking more money from you and why L.A. keeps getting worse.

Give me some out-and-out quid-pro-quo bribery like they get in Chicago and New York. and I’d give you some politicians in jail and a city that works.

 

 

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to Urban blight and legalized public corruption

  1. anonymous says:

    The problems continue with the Dept of Planning and the Dept of Building and Safety. Planning has been approving many overly dense condo projects, from six to 10 units per lot, per SB1818 even before the city’s official Density Bonus Law was passed. For proof, look over “unit sizes” and “units/lot” for almost all 2005-2007 Sunland-Tujunga completed condo projects. You’ll find that many were illegally allowed to use the greater density factors. Why was that allowed. Nobody could stop them. The neighbors didn’t want to spend the money for an attorney. The Planning officials just passed it through.
    As a matter of fact, many of the projects were “TT”, tentative tracts and therefore had a reduced/shortened “public oversite” process. Neighborhood Councils did nothing. They were either incompetant or indifferent.

  2. anonymous says:

    BTW, why do you think the city only recently decided to pass it’s version of SB1818. It’s because somebody finally prepared to sue the city for it’s illegal, anticipatory use of SB1818 specifications.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>