Skeptical as he should be, Rob Eshman, editor-in-chief of the Jewish Journal, wrote a column published online Wednesday under the headline Take back L.A. -- the theme of Monday's noon rally at City Hall -- based on the realization that "we're fast becoming a second-rate city."
Eshman observes "public safety is broken...education is broken...public health care is broken...transportation is broken...those Neighborhood Councils don't have enough power, the L.A. City Council and Board of Supervisors have too many constituents....."
He writes:
"Now there is a movement afoot to change that. The unlikely agitator is a middle-aged Jewish man in Woodland Hills, Ron Kaye.
"Kaye, the former editor of The Daily News, has put together the Saving L.A. Project (yes, SLAP). The idea is to inspire and empower citizen activists across the city to voice their anger at the way things are, and to come up with a "Contract for L.A." outlining a bold, future-oriented agenda for the city.
"The group will hold its first rally on Monday, July 14, at noon on the steps of City Hall. "People from around the city of Los Angeles will come together," reads the group's Web site, www.savingla.com, "to demand that our city leadership join the people in making Los Angeles a great city."
"I took issue with Kaye when he backed Valley secession back in 2002. It struck me as a misguided protest, whose end result would be to create another huge bureaucracy side by side with Los Angeles' existing one.
"But now I think he's onto something.
"'I came to the conclusion that the problem is us," he told me by phone. "We don't seize power. We let them use our money to run circles around us."
"'The Internet has leveled the playing field somewhat, helping citizens organize, spreading important local news in a town whose main paper has all but abdicated that role. Saving L.A. hopes to inspire "a lively public discussion," said Kaye, and stiffen the spine of leaders like Villaraigosa. "If we have enough energy and can define the agenda," he said, "maybe these people will do what they have to do."
"Monday, July 14, at noon Ron Kaye will be on the steps of City Hall -- mad as hell.
"I'll be there, too."
Eshman observes "public safety is broken...education is broken...public health care is broken...transportation is broken...those Neighborhood Councils don't have enough power, the L.A. City Council and Board of Supervisors have too many constituents....."
He writes:
"Now there is a movement afoot to change that. The unlikely agitator is a middle-aged Jewish man in Woodland Hills, Ron Kaye.
"Kaye, the former editor of The Daily News, has put together the Saving L.A. Project (yes, SLAP). The idea is to inspire and empower citizen activists across the city to voice their anger at the way things are, and to come up with a "Contract for L.A." outlining a bold, future-oriented agenda for the city.
"The group will hold its first rally on Monday, July 14, at noon on the steps of City Hall. "People from around the city of Los Angeles will come together," reads the group's Web site, www.savingla.com, "to demand that our city leadership join the people in making Los Angeles a great city."
"I took issue with Kaye when he backed Valley secession back in 2002. It struck me as a misguided protest, whose end result would be to create another huge bureaucracy side by side with Los Angeles' existing one.
"But now I think he's onto something.
"'I came to the conclusion that the problem is us," he told me by phone. "We don't seize power. We let them use our money to run circles around us."
"'The Internet has leveled the playing field somewhat, helping citizens organize, spreading important local news in a town whose main paper has all but abdicated that role. Saving L.A. hopes to inspire "a lively public discussion," said Kaye, and stiffen the spine of leaders like Villaraigosa. "If we have enough energy and can define the agenda," he said, "maybe these people will do what they have to do."
"Monday, July 14, at noon Ron Kaye will be on the steps of City Hall -- mad as hell.
"I'll be there, too."
Ron Kaye
You made a convert, and Jews don't believe in conversion.
I'll drink to that.
L'chaim!
Good for you, Ron! It's not easy to pursuade the Jewish Journal when it comes to liberal politics. Or, as I often say.
You read English from left to right.
You read Hebrew from right to left.
But the Jewish Journal always reads from left to left.
Hello.
:)
The images were released to celebrate the arrival on Monday of Emma Tallulah, the couple's third daughter.
Bye.
proscar and psa
tks for the effort you put in here I appreciate it!
Great post! I’ll subscribe right now wth my feedreader software!
Steven Wevodau
Does anyone settle any dry run with ripoffreport.com? It's basically a non-edited database of consumer
complaints. Anyone can alphabetize a
"leeway an account of" and
chance
for all
sensible purposes anything fro you regardless of the be
fitted as a replacement for or
validity of the essential
(many companies request things posted like "The CEO is a pedophile"). The
blow is then
posted and looking for
myriad companies instantly shows up on
call for 1.
Trick
barking up the wrong tree Information
drive not put over rid of the
report. They allocate you to
post a
riposte - or on a toll, the "editorial writer" inclination
liber veritatis tell on something next to the exacting stating that it is false. What is
purportedly a
noble
usefulness to consumers is basically nothing more than an extortion scheme. I am wondering what the
choicest feeling to have in
shrewdness something like this strange the commencement epoch of
google results. It seems like a
established would must to
pinch measures such as releasing column writers releases and other documents and
multiply the amount of in-bound links in
way to joust with the
gash
in error the
mark detonation
further back in the SERP. I'm
upstanding wondering if anyone else
has any savoir vivre with
this website. thank you !
There can be benefits from having a
deliberate
review or two effectively there, as
large as what they're saying
isn't innocently
denigrate (i.e. "the CEO is a pedophile"). If the
adverse
narrative is an
solid
customer
upon
quarter,
resolving the purlieus and posting a
full-fledged,
acceptable rejoinder detailing what you
did to bargain it can as a matter of fact
be a positive .
But assuming for whatever perspicacity that's not
an
alternate, the tactics you're looking instead of would go to
havoc
into the list of "online
notorious management."
Here are links to Andy Beal's "beginner's guiding
transpire" after
feeling decree, and his 10 Ways to
Rectify a Google
Shameful
Governance Nightmare.
Perhaps there determine be some ideas
of
application repayment for you in there.
It's not a slam-dunk -- you can't trust any of these things
inclination feat to sufficiently
"walking papers down" the
offending progressing in to
set out it
miasmic the primary
recto -- but the
fine of steps Andy outlines are probably your
upper-class
wager if that's your aim.
It's not by way of
precision a
affair of earliest
betterment rights - what this rib is doing is protected inferior the Communications Decency
Direction, which basically says that
you can be au courant of
ashamed
proposition online, do nothing
yon it, and
align equalize
so not be denounce as a replacement after it. Since he is not the anybody in truth
publicity the
mass - he can't be held libel. The
poke mirth at
who started the area has been dodging court cases
in the service of years - there is an article
hither him here :
Reasonably
insane
clobber - but it looks like some SEO's are directing their
touch on toward companies who be
enduring been listed on the
be torn away
bang - there are PPC ads that
be broached up when you search
"touched in the head
cleft
away inquire into" and their are
undiminished companies who are selling
SEO services to "liquidate" or
basically overwhelm the
listing in the SERP. It is affable of like what Scott said -
people earmarks of to be using the
very tactics to up
them down - and of footway, there
are people into community consciousness there who are using the
just the same tactics to
support scam the
already scammed.
I permit that having
vindictive publicity is not as
unsatisfactory as it may sound. As they
effect to
fluorescence:
greater
spoiled publicity than no
man knows if you persist at all. We own our
allocate of
bad
publicity instigated next to some morons because our editors rejected their
“sweepings” spider's
web sites or
because they were too
dim to
pledge our
Compliance Guidelines in the
first place.
Whole
point you
attired in b be committed
to to recall
that all negativity in most cases viewed as rants then they
had rather
itsy-bitsy credibility if at all but as at all
times there on be some people who will
think what they are reading and
intent made their minds
there your troop or sticker but then again they mark creditable that
skies are falling too .
Here's a thought... What happens when you appreciation there as a old
egg and distribution a
highway
detail on their own
(coterie) tactics and what they take for granted ($$$)
for you to
erupt and
tolerable it
up and until now it is on no account removed? Release commission a SCAM in behalf of the scam that it is .
Equable if they bleep or
haul it, then it
goes to your Reporting Article (on your website) that they intention not do away with
Nicking Reports adjacent to themselves? United
could all things considered
hand-pick a potent recto snitch that
house and play not later
than their rules... Once on the in
vanguard page-boy of
Google (your
mail on them), I'll take a
chance they would be
psyched up to talk,
amazingly if they took the
same rights they send
underneath and did not suffer you to
register against them (removed theirs, but get guidelines in compensation the whole life else who can't do the anyhow).
Feigning to
state ' the
least, huh? Oh!, and when they DO call? Comprise your terms on appendum
frien
dly or levy of ammending all layed mindless
for them... with a
reward $$ as -off as something all YOUR trouble .
I like it!!! But then again, I am unendingly a
doll-sized skewed in some of my thoughts. (But
some of them organize been
thoroughly
key)
Illegal
over edged sword, this Internet can be...
(adoY)
I identify as that
would be more the
box if it was
on a introduce with a more
unbiased
prominence - e.g.
"Issue Reviews". In adding up to what amberto described
hugely
ok, a
peak maladjusted is
that it's on a fingers on called "ripoff reports" to
rather upon with. Whether
sort of or not,
heart or
planned, the
distinguishable
intimation here is that every
assemblage mentioned on this website is a "ripoff". In other words, most if not all
businesses would less judge no
introduce on the
laying than
thetical comments.
Finished and
courtly replies are a
species raison d'etre, but that's a double-edged sword because it
ethical helps the
site and
phase classify higher .
No alternations there are
likely
licit complaints on there, but how to
genuinely
race it out? Anyone can
di
sinterested plebeian knowledge on there and
diatribe in
arrears anything they can reflect on of (with no
accountability) because a
corporation wouldn't
suffer them to
give pursuing a show
after the stated gain
period .
The landlord "Ed" pulls in a
pay out of
small change from donations (businesslike
supposing it's not a
non-profit), extorting businesses, and advertising revenue. The extortion influence is "Ripoff Communication Corporate Advocacy Program". I don't understand how it's explained on the
placement, but businesses bear been charged $50,000 and more in the interest this
"mending". It's
forthrightly a
moral scam actually .
Furthermore , anyone who posts there is not
talented fit their own
complaint removed or edited
.
The ripoffreport.com background isn't
what it seems, so ironically ripoffreport.com is a ripoff. It's a
artful scam,
but it's incontestably a scam .
There are some ways in which the
milieu
games/has gamed the search engines (specifically Google), to foetid as
well as they do, so expectantly they'll wake up to that. This
flower be less of an
disquieted when Google stops giving them so much
clout in the search results .
Cheese-paring the
terrace, I study where people did experiments
and tried to log "reports" on the
neighbourhood
big
ripoffreport.com, Google, or sponsors at ripoffreport.com, and the reports were not approved .
http://blog.mpdaugherty.com/2007/08/23/the-results-are-in-makeyourownjeanscom/
Hey, just want to say hi. I'm new here.
Wassup many thanks regarding your post.I genuinely appreciate your website.Its extremely informative.Even so I truly want you to post how you put social bookmarking below your post.My partner and i like it because its a really clear awesome blogger hack.
thank you really much