Comment on this post

Echo Park Cell Phone Towers: A lesson in second-class citizenship

From the ivory tower of a newsroom, I long ago grew critical of City Hall’s inaction. Now that I’m getting down to there in person an activist, my attitude has changed.

The corruption of democratic processes, the view of the public as second-class citizens, the ingrained subservience of politicians and bureaucrats to special interests is far worse than I thought.

On Monday, I trekked to the 10th Floor of that Thumbnail image for Thumbnail image for Thumbnail image for Thumbnail image for Thumbnail image for Thumbnail image for City_Hall_(color)_edit1.jpgPalace of Greed and found myself as usual wondering what could have been achieved if they had spent half of the $300 million it cost to luxuriously refurbish City Hall on programs that benefited the people, like effective gang prevention programs, a police crime lab, street paving and other basics of civilized society.

I was there to see how Zoning Administrator Andre Parvenu handled the crowd of Echo Park residents upset over T-Mobile’s plan to put 12 cell phone towers atop a landmark apartment building, the Delmor, at 1551 Echo Park Blvd.

Parvenu, who didn’t return my landline phone calls last week, didn’t show up. And neither did T-Mobile or the landlord who stands to reap a handsome windfall profit if the cell phones towers go on his building.

Albert Landini was handling the hearing. He seemed like a decent man but officious and clearly acted like the 40 or so community activists in attendance were more an annoyance that had to be tolerated as part of the job but whose concerns were largely irrelevant.

It seemed he only had ears for T-Mobile as he asked at least 10 times if the company’s representatives were present before acknowledging in the end that the company “blew me off.” and its absence “bodes well” for the community.

The community’s case was helped by the support given by Council President Eric Garcetti who sent a staffer who made two key points that Landini took seriously: The towers would rise 10 feet above the 45-foot height limit in the area and Garcetti will see historical-cultural status for the century-old apartment building, exactly what activists are seeking to protect Griffith Park from development.

Listen to the audio atof the start of the hearing where Landini lays down tough ground rules
to the community, shows he’s eagerly looking around for T-Mobile
representatives and then happily agrees Garcetti’s staffer should go
first.garcetti(128Kbps).mp3

Then, it was Echo Park’s turn. They lined up one after another and pridefully told their story: How artists, musicians, students, young professionals were creating a lively and hip neighborhood, how Echo Park was just named one of America’s 10 great neighborhoods by the American Planning Assn., how assaults on the character of the community like T-Mobile’s undermined its regeneratin.

They presented petitions from 500 people and complained the towers were a threat
to their health and the value of their property. They complained the
towers were visual bligh to the thousands of people who live above the
Delmor. They warned the leaky roof of the Delmor might collapse and
kill them from the weight of the towers. They resented the fact
T-Mobile and the landlord would profit handsomely and the community
would be trashed.

Throughout the hearing, Landini made it clear that the health concerns of all those radio waves was under federal law not an issue for his consideration and, beyond that, he repeatedly scoffed at the idea that cell towers are dangerous in any way.

He dismissed as mere hearsay worries about renters fleeing and other negative impact on property values.

What struck me most is the impression I got that cellular companies had a “right” to put towers wherever they wanted unless there was a clear legal reason standing in their way. And that’s what is so disturbing:

Why doesn’t L.A. have clear rational rules that protect community interests and define where and how the towers can be placed? Other cities do that but then other cities actually care about the people who live, work and do business in them.

Near the end, I joined the parade of witnesses to make the point that the concerns of Echo Park are the concerns of every neighborhood in the city — which is the whole reason we started the Saving L.A. Projectcellron1.wav

Finally it was Landini’s turn to sum up what he heard from careful notes he took of each issue that was raised. Given the rules he operates under and the mentality of City Hall, it seemed a fair analysis of the situation landini-end.mp3.

It’ll be interesting to see what goes on behind the scenes over the
month or so Landini needs to make up his mind and write his decision.

But you can bet T-Mobile
will find a way to tell its story in back rooms where deals can be cut
and you can be sure the city will not adopt new regulations that give the community a genuine voice in decisions.

Last year, T-Mobile paid 78,000 to a lobbyist to try to get DWP policies affecting it changes. This year, in contrast, it has contributed just $500 each this year to Council Members Eric Garcetti, Ed Reyes and Janice Hahn and paid $15,000 to a small firm called John Q. Public Affairs for help in putting cell phone towers wherever it wants around town.

If the company really wants to screw the John Q. Publics of Los Angeles, it’s going to have throw a lot more money than that around City Hall.

And even that might not work if more communities get organized like this Echo Park neighborhood and if communities around the city the issue isn’t just local to one neighborhood but affects us all.

This entry was posted in City Hall, Community Activists, Hot Topics, Los Angeles. Bookmark the permalink.

10 Responses to Echo Park Cell Phone Towers: A lesson in second-class citizenship

  1. Anonymous says:

    Judicial Watch Announces List of Washington’s “Ten Most Wanted Corrupt Politicians” for 2007
    1. Senator Hillary Rodham CLINTON (D-NY)
    2. Rep. John Conyers (D-MI)
    3. Senator Larry Craig (R-ID)
    4. Senator Diane Feinstein (D-CA)
    5. Former New York Mayor Rudy Giuliani (R-NY)
    6. Governor Mike Huckabee (R-AR)
    7. I. Lewis “Scooter” Libby
    8. Senator Barack OBAMA (D-IL)
    9. Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D-CA)
    10. Senator Harry Reid (D-NV)
    http://www.judicialwatch.org/judicial-watch-announces-list-washington-s-ten-most-wanted-corrupt-politicians-2007

  2. Anonymous says:

    but i want better reception

  3. Anonymous says:

    It funny how you spin stuff to look as though a wireless carrier could actually pay off city officials. You obviously have nothing better to do than jump on a band wagon that has nothing to do with you or your concerns.
    Why dont you walk into Counsilman Rosendahls office you idiot and maybe you will see that there there is no truth to your comspiracy theory MORON!

  4. No bars says:

    as much as the urban hippies dont want this thing, I live across the street and have no reception so i would not mind the cell towers

  5. Anonymous says:

    The City of Los Angeles is one of the few jursidictions that receives the most litigation. Therefore have one of the most strict processes, and development standards for the siting and applicaton of these cellphone towers, more strict than most ‘other cities’ as you put it.
    I would advise you to do more research on both sides before writing another document for public consumption. It is the job of a journalist to strive to provide objective information unless you are writing the opinions column.

  6. Beto says:

    I really don’t get the big deal about adding cell towers to areas. They now disguise towers to look like ‘palm trees’ and can’t really tell its a tower. One example here in Reseda behind a liquor store in the back parking lot. Ive see that palm tree while driving by on Saticoy street and didn’t realize it was a cell tower until I looked up cell towers in my area and told me it’s location.
    Im for more cell towers. They’ve gotten creative. No more eye sore.

  7. Great article, I am a huge fan of your blog, keep on posting that great content, and I will be a regular visitor for a very long time.

  8. Ed Peterson says:

    Great article, I’m regular visitor of your website, keep on writing these great posts, and I will be a regular for a very long time.

  9. GlenM says:

    The people commenting on this blog who think this is about basic cell phone coverage or 911 safety have no idea what they are talking about and obviously don’t know the case or the issue. these were not a bunch of Nimbys or people against technology and that is why they won.
    T-Mobile claims they are “only trying to provide cell service and 911 services” but they say the same thing at every hearing, every case. These are Trojan horse arguments to justify unnecessary placements to give them the ability to compete for broadband internet and video/TV market in residential areas. The idea that we should have a 100% wireless company allowed to set up an infrastructure – that has all these risks associated for services we can get better via fiber – in residential areas just so they can market services we don’t need is absurd. FYI: Even a cell phone without a service carrier will connect to any signal of any carrier as a priority call when 911 is dialed. Landlines are also more reliable in emergencies (long way off if not impossible – to pinpoint a location of a 911 cell call with the same accuracy of a landline). And if the wireless industry is so concerned about our safety, why did they successfully lobby to overturn the FCC requirement to provide even 8 hours of emergency battery backup? And do they care about all the accidents causes by those driving and using their cell phones? Gee, I think everyone should be able to watch a movie on their cell phone while driving, don’t you? Best regards, Glen from mobile development

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>