By Greg Nelson
Former General Manager, Department of Neighborhood Empowerment
By this time I'm sure you are aware of the vicious attack on the neighborhood council system
that is being formulated by the City Council's Budget and Finance Committee.
I viewed the meeting on the city's website the next morning and wrote a report for CityWatch
that can be read at http://www.citywatchla.com/content/view/2260/. I won't repeat what's in it. Rather, I'd like to say some things that the Department of Neighborhood Empowerment cannot say. It's my advantage as a retiree.
KEY DATES:
First of all, there is some confusion about the key dates that lie ahead. I checked with
the City Clerk and the CLA.
May 12. The Budget and Finance Committee is scheduled to have its final votes on its
recommended amendments to the mayor's budget. It could go through each item one at a time,
or vote on the whole package. At this meeting, the Chief Legislative Analyst (CLA) brings
with him a written report on the amendments he feels the committee wants to adopt. You
won't find this on the website before the meeting. It's a good day for public testimony to
be heard.
May 15. The mayor's budget and the committee's recommended changes will be formally
presented to the full City Council AND public testimony will be heard. Another good day to
show up.
May 18. The City Council goes to work on the budget. In past years, this has been started
and finished on the same day. It's possible that this year, the process could be
"stretched" over two days. The following day is Election Day, so who knows.
WHO'S TO BLAME?
Many of you have been asking if there was a vote in committee on the proposal to reduce the
annual allocation to the neighborhood councils down to about $10,000. There wasn't a formal
recorded vote.
Greig Smith and Bernard Parks led the attack. At the end, Parks made a suggestion, the one
you've been reading about. It was one of those "without objection" moments. Parks made his
suggestion and nobody else on the committee offered an alternative r spoke up. The
committee members can change their minds on May 12.
Wendy Greuel was absent. Bill Rosendahl played a minor role. Jose Huizar expressed
concerned about the disportionate hit that the neighborhood councils would be taking.
WHAT TO DO:
NCs and the individuals within them need to decide if they're going to propose a compromise or draw the line here. Throughout the Neighborhood Council File issue, the NCs kept giving and giving, negotiating with no one but still compromising, and they ended up with the City Council deciding that all board members needed to fill out extensive forms about their financial and property holdings in order to voice their opinions.
So you've got a choice here: assume that the other council members will be looking for
compromise, and try and craft one with what little time you have, or demand that the council
members support the mayor's proposal.
Former General Manager, Department of Neighborhood Empowerment
By this time I'm sure you are aware of the vicious attack on the neighborhood council system
that is being formulated by the City Council's Budget and Finance Committee.
I viewed the meeting on the city's website the next morning and wrote a report for CityWatch
that can be read at http://www.citywatchla.com/content/view/2260/. I won't repeat what's in it. Rather, I'd like to say some things that the Department of Neighborhood Empowerment cannot say. It's my advantage as a retiree.
KEY DATES:
First of all, there is some confusion about the key dates that lie ahead. I checked with
the City Clerk and the CLA.
May 12. The Budget and Finance Committee is scheduled to have its final votes on its
recommended amendments to the mayor's budget. It could go through each item one at a time,
or vote on the whole package. At this meeting, the Chief Legislative Analyst (CLA) brings
with him a written report on the amendments he feels the committee wants to adopt. You
won't find this on the website before the meeting. It's a good day for public testimony to
be heard.
May 15. The mayor's budget and the committee's recommended changes will be formally
presented to the full City Council AND public testimony will be heard. Another good day to
show up.
May 18. The City Council goes to work on the budget. In past years, this has been started
and finished on the same day. It's possible that this year, the process could be
"stretched" over two days. The following day is Election Day, so who knows.
WHO'S TO BLAME?
Many of you have been asking if there was a vote in committee on the proposal to reduce the
annual allocation to the neighborhood councils down to about $10,000. There wasn't a formal
recorded vote.
Greig Smith and Bernard Parks led the attack. At the end, Parks made a suggestion, the one
you've been reading about. It was one of those "without objection" moments. Parks made his
suggestion and nobody else on the committee offered an alternative r spoke up. The
committee members can change their minds on May 12.
Wendy Greuel was absent. Bill Rosendahl played a minor role. Jose Huizar expressed
concerned about the disportionate hit that the neighborhood councils would be taking.
WHAT TO DO:
NCs and the individuals within them need to decide if they're going to propose a compromise or draw the line here. Throughout the Neighborhood Council File issue, the NCs kept giving and giving, negotiating with no one but still compromising, and they ended up with the City Council deciding that all board members needed to fill out extensive forms about their financial and property holdings in order to voice their opinions.
So you've got a choice here: assume that the other council members will be looking for
compromise, and try and craft one with what little time you have, or demand that the council
members support the mayor's proposal.
Because time is short, I wouldn't worry too much about calling NC meetings in order to
adopt positions. Besides, the City Council already decided that it would ban Community
Impact Statements from being printed on agendas, so that tool has been degraded.
Much more powerful than how many NCs take a position on this matter, or how many Community
Impact Statements are filed, is how many INDIVDUALS apply pressure to the City Council
members. This is about pure politics. Volume counts.
Rather than wait for this matter to come up in the City Council, there could be a steady
flow of speakers coming to the City Council meetings between now and then, and using Public
Comment time to express their feelings. It's always dangerous, and often fruitless to wait
until the last minute.
DOUBLE STANDARD:
What also apalls me is that while this is going on, the City Council brags that it is taking a 10% cut along with everyone else. But their slush fund, the Council District Community Services fund, has been recommended by the mayor to be funded once again at $1,500,000, or $100,000 per City Council district. No 10% cut.
The money is spent at the discretion of the Council member, but unlike expenditures made in public meetings by the NCs, and listed on the Internet, the City Council member decides secretly how to spend the money. Try going to the city's website, or the city budget to find out how this money is spent. You won't find anything.
But worse is that the Council members are allowed to rollover unused money from this fund each year -- something that they want to prohibit the NCs from doing, and the Council members quietly give themselves permission at the end of each year (it's going to happen soon) to transfer unused money from the slush fund to their office budgets to pay for staff salaries.
The simple message to ask your friends, and organizations you've befriended, to send to the City Council is to support the mayor's proposal regarding the Neighborhood Council Funding Program. If you can state a few reasons, all the better.
FIGHTING FOR YOUR RIGHTS:
I would like to encourage attorneys who support the neighborhood council system to contact me at gregn213@cox.net. There are three parts of the City Charter and the City Administrative Code that are being violated, and I would like to brainstorm some legal solutions.
The first area involves what the Budget and Finance Committee is trying to do. Laws have certain expectations of the neighborhood councils, and it requires the Department of Neighborhood Empowerment and the city to provide enough support to get the job done. At some point, I'm sure a court would agree, the support would get so low that laws would be violated.
Second is the Early Warning part of the City Charter. It requires that NCs be given enough notice before decisons are made so they can discuss them and weigh in. But the law is routinely violated. The last example was the way Proposition B, the solar measure, was rushed to the ballot. Clearly it was done this way to ensure that was no time for the kind of public discussion that the City Charter requires.
The third relates to that part of the City Charter that requires the city to put into the budget enough money to support the NC system in the following year. Yet, the amount of money that is earmarked for this just $140,000. Hardly enough for all the city staff, the elections, and offices, staff, and communications for the NCs, etc.
I know how bullies work. They will take and take, and push and push as long as they can get away with it. It might be time to "just say no."
FIXING THE BUDGET PROCESS:
This may be a time when you will get a receptive audience for another badly needed change. As soon as this budget is over, work begins on the next one. Sadly, the budget timetable allows little or no time for NCs and others to get involved once the proposed budget is released. The mayor must release the budget BY April 20, but he can release it earlier to give the City Council and the public time to engage in meaningful discussions. I don't think there is any other city in the nation where the city budget deliberations take place in one day.
Ron Kaye is the former editor of the Los Angeles Daily News where he spent 23 years helping to make the newspaper the voice of the San Fernando Valley and fighting for a city government that serves the people and not special interests.
Twice in recent years, Los Angeles Magazine listed Kaye among the city’s most influential people, specifically in the area of politics. Kaye has been variously described in the media as the “accidental anarchist,” “the Patrick Henry of the San Fernando Valley” and a “passionate populist.” He is now committed to
carrying on his crusade for a greater Los Angeles as an ordinary citizen. Previously, Ron worked at the Los Angeles Herald Examiner,
Associated Press, Cleveland Plain Dealer and The Australian as well as papers
in Fairbanks, Alaska and Yakima, Wash. He also wrote for Newsweek magazine, The Guardian in London and the National Enquirer.
Clark sounds like one of those retired cops who has it in for LAPD. Sorry you didn't promote Clark but don't take it out on the world. You are full of shit. Neighborhood Councils have more power then you making it seem. Hellloooo they just blocked Measure B with no money against Antonio's slush fund of over $3 million. So stop being a girlie and man up
Dear Councilman Smith
Your email "In Response to Recent Mischaracterizations About Neighborhood Council Funds" it seems like back pedalling at best and disingenuous at worst. If you really wanted to save jobs, everyone of the council members would take a pay cut (maybe 15% so you could out do the mayor), reduce the pay by 10% of everyone making $100,000 or more and 5% for those making less, reduce your office budgets, eliminate the city car fleet (though that would eliminate some jobs, but save money for essential services like street services, trash collection and library hours), finally tackle the runaway pension costs that the city can no longer afford and will eventually overwhelm the city's ability to fund them in very short order, let the Neighborhood Councils run their own elections again (the cost would be under 500K and perhaps much less. That alone would solve the NC budget dilemma and eliminate some city clerk staff that would no longer be necessary saving even more money), forgo the discretionary fund of 100K for each council office that is in fact political largess that seems to have no oversight. The list is quite long and can certainly get longer. You really need to think outside the box on this one.
Your intentions are clear. You value city jobs over providing a voice (and budget for same) for the electorate in the form of Neighborhood Councils. Your history, your actions and your attitudes bolster that perception. Actions will speak louder than words and the only action that will convince anyone in this budget discussion that you care about Neighborhood Councils is to provide adequate funding for them. I am thinking that the 10% reduction the mayor has proffered from the previous budget would be fair and equitable in light of what is being asked of other departments.
By the way, nothing has been mischaracterized in what has been discussed on blogs and emails. They have hit the nail on the head and your attempt to marginalize and discredit the discussion as misinformation begs the question "Have you no shame, sir?"
This response from you, couched as a special announcement, is little more than damage control for what has been correctly identified as disrespect for Neighborhood Councils, questioning the reason for their existence and the necessity to provide funding to allow them to be effective.
You have the opportunity to do the right thing. You will just have to recognize what it is.