February 2010 Archives

It is a sign of the times that the mayor has actually been forced to engage the public in discussions, preliminary as they might be, about how LA is going to survive as a city even as it brings spending into balance with revenue for the first time in years.

A sign of his own weakness and the failure of the city's leadership, to be sure, but a positive step toward actually coming to respect the public and share power with the civic, business, labor and community leaders.

Deputy Mayor Larry Frank, assigned to co-opt and calm the anger of Neighborhood Council members, was assigned the unenviable task of meeting Saturday with Budget LA, the group that has been brought dozens of community activists together every Saturday for weeks to try to develop a strategy for saving the Charter-created civic empowerment movement from destruction.

The mayor has fired the head of the Department of Neighborhood Empowerment and plans to eliminate the department entirely with the full support of the City Council to reduce this year's $212 million deficit by $2 million.

It is Frank's job to make it look like this is being done in the name of efficiency and cost saving, to hide the truth that it is being done because they fear the growing influence and organization of community groups across the city.

Frank, in a lengthy and detailed explanation, laid out the mayor's plan such as it is to fix the massive budget deficit as if he were talking to fourth graders.

But it's nonetheless instructive because it's the first time anyone from the mayor's office has actually tried to explain why nearly 7,000 jobs of people who run the parks and libraries, do the community planning and building code enforcement, and provide dozens of other basic services to the general public are proposed for elimination.These are more than half the jobs in those positions.

I know most of you will not actually watch these videos and see for yourselves what a fairy tale Frank spun for the Neighborhood Council people on Saturday, a fairy tale that does not have a happy ending.

So here's the takeaway: Setting aside the obfuscations and outright false statements, the mayor's plan is to slash basic services, sell off valuable assets like parking structures and the Convention Center to his pals, and borrow billions of dollars just to get through this year and next.

He has no plan to deal with the $775 million deficit the year after or the more than $1 billion deficit equal to more than 25 percent of the city's operating budget the year after.

If you believe in miracles, economic miracles in this case, everyone will live happily ever after. If you don't, maybe you better watch these videos and know for yourself what is going on.





EDITOR'S NOTE: Read the consultant's report recommending massive DWP electricity rate hikes at OurLA.org.


You don't know nothing if you didn't know this was coming: Massive DWP rate hikes.

 

How else did you think they were going bail out the sinking ship of the city except by socking it to you?

 

It's all been a setup, planned for a long time and now it's being executed: 800 percent increase in the "energy cost adjustment factor" pass-through on April 1, 20 percent increase in the next 12 months, 33 percent with last year included.

 

And from there, you can be 100 percent certain your power rates will keep going up and away, doubled and tripled.

 

You are sitting in the DWP's electric chair and they are about to pull the switch. I've been telling you this was coming for months so don't be shocked when your electricity bill soars higher than your mortgage.

 

Don't kid yourselves: It's the people who have mortgages that are paying the bulk of these rate hikes.

 

They jiggled the rate tiers to punish the 40 percent of residents who live in single family homes while keeping bills low for most apartment dwellers and tripling the number of customers with heavy subsidies to 250,000 households - a sixth of DWP's customers.

 

They squandered tens of millions of dollars pretending to go green but have the worst renewable energy portfolio in the state so they are desperate to buy wind and solar power from anybody who has some no matter what it costs to meet the 20 percent goal mandated by the state by the end of this year.

 

They have painted themselves into a corner and don't know any other way except to slug it to the middle class, from those just getting by on two family incomes to those in the upper middle class who have seen their wealth decline sharply and their incomes fall.

 

This is their cockeyed theory of municipal socialism laid bare, a redistribution of wealth that gives pennies to the poor and feeds the insider culture that has feasted so long on the public treasury.

 

The DWP is the city's cash cow. It has hired 1,400 workers since the recession began and now has transferred 300 city workers facing layoffs to its payroll with most of them getting raises of 20 to 40 percent.

 

When other city workers gave up raises, City Hall rewarded DWP employees with 3.25 percent lump sum cash payments and guaranteed them raises of up to 4 percent for the following four years - raises for people who already are the highest paid utility workers in the nation.

 

Somebody has got to pay the bills for all this featherbedding and over-indulgence, and that's you.

Somebody has got to pay for all these sweetheart contracts for contractors, consultants and power purchases, and that's you.

 

Somebody has got to pay the bills to rebuild the water and power infrastructure that is bursting and blowing up from neglect while they put the money into the pockets of workers and insiders, and that's you.

 

And every time you pay more, don't forget that nearly 20 percent of your money goes straight into the general fund to bail out City Hall from its deficits that total billions of dollars and are going up every week by millions of dollars.

 

Somebody has got to pay, alright. I say make them pay. If you want to help me do that, go up to the right-hand column of this page and see how you can donate to OurLA.org, my non-profit community news and networking site so I can hire a reporter who will work full-time to penetrate the secrecy of the DWP and expose where your money is really going.

 

Or you can just get used to paying more and more of your hard-earned money for less and less.

The long-awaited consulting report on pass-through electricity charges was released Friday, calling for an immediate 800 percent increase in the energy cost adjustment factor and increases every quarter that will raise overall power rates by more than 20 percent within a year.

The massive increases are being sought as DWP officials face intense pressure to have a revenue sream to be able to lose at least four deals to buy solar and wind energy to meet the stand-mandated goal of 20 percent renewable energy by the end of this calendar year.

For the year ending June 2009, the residential rate was 11.8 cents.

For the year ending June 2010, the residential rate per the budget is projected to be 13.1 cents.

A 2.7 cent increase is a 20.6% increase based off of the 2010 number, or 22.9% off of the 2009 number.

If you add the 2.7 cent increase to the 13.1, you arrive at 15.8 cents -- a 33.9% increase over the 2009 rate.

Click here for the full report by PA Consulting.

The charges leveled by fired LA County Planning chief Bruce McClendon a year ago got credence from a just completed outside consultant's audit of alleged improper influence in decisions on development by Supervisors and their staffs.

It's how politics works in the insiders' game of public policy in both the city and county.

Yet, the report largely whitewashes what went in, citing the fact county employees were not under oath, feared for the loss of their jobs and McClendon didn't record private conversations.

Those reasons for the failure of the report to come to a clear conclusion ought to justify a Grand Jury investigation -- which is what should have happened from the beginning.

Here's the link to the Times report and you can read the report yourself at OurLA.org.'
Once upon a time, there were mice  who lived in a house and were terrified of the cat who lived there too.

So one day, the mice all got together to figure out how to outwit their common enemy, the Cat. Some said this, and some said that; but at last a young mouse got up and said he had a proposal to make, which he thought would meet the case.

"You will all agree," said he, "that our chief danger consists in the sly and treacherous manner in which the enemy approaches us.

"Now, if we could receive some signal of her approach, we could easily escape from her. I venture, therefore, to propose that a small bell be procured, and attached by a ribbon round the neck of the Cat. By this means we should always know when she was about, and could easily retire while she was in the neighborhood."

This proposal met with general applause, until an old mouse got up and said: "That is all very well, but who is to bell the Cat?"

The mice looked at one another and nobody spoke. Then the old mouse said: "It is easy to propose impossible remedies."   

I share this fable that a reader sent to me because of all the talk about firing 4,000 city workers in a manner that will force parks and libraries to close and many of the services we all pay for to be sharply reduced even more than they have been, from tree trimming to street repair.

It is easy for the Mayor and City Council to toy with such an impossible remedy because once elected, they think they have cushy jobs for life and don't have to care about what the people say anymore.

They all know, or at least most of them do, that they massive elimination of all those jobs and all the early retirements affect only the 20 percent of the city workforce that provide direct services to the public for the most part

Police and Fire, revenue producing jobs, jobs that support the system itself are exempt from this remedy and the shutting down of public services will make LA even less attractive to business and lead to even more unemployment and decay.

So they look for ways to avoid the 4,000 layoffs by padding the payrolls of the Harbor, Airport, DWP and special funds.

But that too is an impossible remedy. It might save many of those jobs but the services they now provide will still be lost and the financial burdens those transfers impose will simply be passed on to business and the public, particularly in DWP rate increases.

The mice who are our leaders keeping trying to bell the cat of the budget deficit created by their mismanagement of the city's business.

The system itself has failed. We cannot any longer afford the nation's highest paid elected officials or the sweetheart contract that have cut with unions, developers, contractors and consultants who have put them in office and kept them there.

The remedy that is possible, that is within their ability, is to share power with labor, business and the community, to bring us all to table. It is only way that faith in government can be restored, the only way we can work out the only solution to the problems that threaten the future of our city.

Firing or transferring thousands of workers doesn't solve anything.

Only by city workers, particularly in those drawing exorbitant salaries in elected office, top positions and the DWP, must take a step backward financially -- pay cuts and pension reforms.

Workers would be fools to accept such a deal after getting the runaround for the last year unless it was part of deal the provided long-term job security.

It's my belief that, despite the skepticism about the public's willingness to accept new taxes, taxpayers would step forward and agree to share the sacrifices if power were really shared.

The mice can't bell the cat because mice can't work cooperatively for the common good. We the people aren't mice. We are capable of cooperation. Working together as equals, we can do the impossible. We can bell the cat and remedy the city's financial crisis.
They're coming after me and my four-legged brethren to help solve the city's financial crisis!
Thumbnail image for Thumbnail image for Thumbnail image for bruno4.JPG
After perusing the Dog Trainer and Green Sheet this morning, I saw an LAWeakly story highlighted on the Westside White Guy's blog that the dog catchers think could fetch an additional $3.6 million for the city by going after unlicensed pooches.

And who would rat them out? DWP meter readers! Apparently these guys have something called a  "doggie database."  Sure, the homeland security folks can't do racial profiling, but when it comes to dogs, the DWP can be Gestapo-like in their record keeping.

I knew there was a reason I didn't like those guys, and the pool guy, and the mailman, and the UPS deliveryman, and the.   Well, I don't really like anyone coming near the house.

I am a watchdog, after all. And a good one! Ask Ron and Saint Deb last time someone burglarized RonKayeLA.com central.

My favorite part of the LAWeakly story was Tom LaBonge, one of the 14 city council members who got us into this financial crisis (Krekorian gets a pass cause he's new), had to get his dog a license. Had it not occurred to him before?  Someone might remind him - ex-motorcycle cop Dennis Zine's the perfect candidate - that he also needs a driver's license.

There is, of course, no mention of cats.  I guess the DWP doggie cops don't notice them.  

Here's a suggestion:  let's license everybody in City Hall and make it contingent upon them doing their jobs.  And if they screw up, put them in one of our overcrowded animal shelters.  I'm sure it will give them a new appreciation of our "no kill" policy.

Woof!!

I'm holding you all responsible -- you elected these people and look what they've done to you. It's a crime.

And since it's a crime we need to look at what they knew and when they knew it and, more importantly in this case, what did they do about it.

The specific crime in questions -- among the long list of allegations having to do with destroying our park, library and museum systems among dozens of others -- is the 4,000 layoffs that has City Council members tearing their hair out and bleeding on their laptops as if the only people suffering hard times are city workers.

At least, they are the only people the politicians care about since the city workers with help help from developers, contractors, consultants and political operatives put them into office.

On Tuesday, Ed Reyes and Jan Perry sneered and snarled at Paul Krekorian who had the guts to ask how the Council could go into a back room session at noon for a catered lunch six days ago to discuss firing 1,000 workers and come out to announce a "technical change," as Perry put it, that would result in 4,000 layoffs.

On Wednesday, Bernard Parks, Greig Smith and Perry once again carried on and on about how everybody knew as long as 18 months or two years ago that the city had to eliminate 4,000 jobs because of the deepening budget deficit. So newcomers like Krekorian and Paul Koretz should just shut their damn mouths and so should the liars among the press and public who can't get their facts straight.

Methinks they protesteth too much, so I got hold of the document which they seem to think proves their innocence. In fact, it does the opposite. They are guilty as hell.

The 4,000 layoffs document (4000layoffs.pdf) actually dates to Dec. 17, 2008, 14 months ago, and came from Chief Legislative Analyst Gerry Miller and Interim City Administrative Officer Ray Ciranna with the title Structural Deficit Mitigation Measures.

They referred to the economic "meltdown" that was occurring and the likelihood things would get much worse, noting that the steps taken days earlier to erase an $86 million deficit involved one-time savings to paper over the problem.

The mayor's own proposal on Dec. 12, 2008 spoke to that, calling for "a combination of budget reductions, expenditure deferrals, and expediting of revenue receipts to the current year.

The CLA/CAO report said tougher measures were needed:

Don't miss this video of exchanges between Ed Reyes, Paul Krekorian and Jan Perry -- a rare few minutes where City Council members actually mix it up.

The issue is how the Council leaped from 1,000 layoffs that they opposed to approving 4,000 layoffs without any public discussion, study or documentation -- a scheme Krekorian had the courage to vote against.

If you're too lazy to actually watch this, tough. It proves that video says more than a thousand stories. You'll never understand why LA is in so much trouble without seeing the level of leadership we have -- and how a single Councilman can make a difference.




I know it's hard to believe that Reyes and Perry think they are making themselves look good by telling the world that a report nearly 18 months ago said 4,000 layoffs were needed to balance the budget so it wasn't a number plucked out of thin air.

They seem oblivious to the fact they ignored that advice and did nothing to balance the budget even in theory until now and self-righteous over Krekorian having the courage to break the code of silence by pointing it out.

The rest of the budget discussion Tuesday was even worse with Janice Hahn tormenting one of the city's best managers in Rec and Parks' Jon Kirk Mukri over the obstacles to her plan to have goats mow the loan in parks, and Alarcon foaming at the mouth against greedy capitalists and Koretz displaying his complete ignorance of just about everything.

Watch these videos and decide who is doing the better job, bureaucrats or politicians?





What's going on in LA is a calamity of historica proportions -- not the kind that causes catastrophic destruction like the day the levees broke in New Orleans. But the kind that just as surely damages a city physically and spiritually like a slow water torture.

Maybe that's why I've spent the day watching City Council members prattle mindlessly and ignorantly about the city's finances, posturing and preening as if they were both blameless for what has happened and had any answers on how to fix what they have broken.

The dark side of my soul took over and all I could see was the bleak outlook for the city I love if left in the hands of these foolish and selfish people.

And then I listened to the good and decent people, who unlike the nation's highest paid and most pampered city officials, give their time and energy out of love, not money, to make their neighborhoods and their city better, appeal for a small measure of sanity.

They came before the Board of Neighborhood Councils for a special meeting just 24 hours after the Mayor had exercised powers he does not have to abolish their department -- the central reform enacted 10 years ago to empower the community.

If it were me I'd have tried to get the more than 1,600 members of 90 Neighborhood Councils to resign in mass and tell City Hall to take their lousy money and shove it. Like homeowners and other community groups, they don't need to be under the thumb of people who treat them with contempt even as they fear them.

But that isn't how these people handled this crisis.

They have been meeting every Saturday for weeks and emailing all day long to generate ideas on how the movement they are part of can gain strength no matter how many obstacles are thrown in their way.

They were polite and constructive and persuasive and the BONC commissioners agreed with them in every regard to push forward even in the face of the treatment they are receiving.

Then, they took their message to Paul Krekorian and Dennis Zine on the Elections and Neighborhood Committee and spoke sincerely from their hearts about what they believed, even when they didn't always agree.

Krekorian and Zine heard their message and voted to go forward with official elections of NCs that start next Tuesday.

The full Council will take up that issue on Wednesday and other aspects of the attempted assassination of the community empowerment issue in the days ahead.

To be honest, I'm just an old softie and tears came to my eyes at times as I listened to these humble voices of the people and I thought a time long ago when I was young and thousands of us stood together in protest and gave ourselves strength with songs of solidarity.

Once again, I came around and knew deep in my heart that I have never lost and never will lose my faith that the good does prevail over the evil, someday.
They're protesting at the school board, they're storming the City Council, they're mad at the mayor, the teachers hate the charters, the charters hate the bureaucrats, the unions and the people hate everyone in government, the whole world of LA is festering with unhappiness.

With liberties from the Kingston Trio's "They're rioting in Africa," it seems to me just about everyone who is even half aware in LA is mad as hell at someone.

It's about time.

There is no mystery. It's been building a long time through successions of mayors and City Council members and school boards and school superintendents, endless attempts at changing the forms of governance, studies, task forces, restructurings.

It's still the same old, same old. Nothing really changes. We approved bond issues for schools, colleges, libraries, parks, police stations and things only get worse until now the bills have come due. There is not enough money for any of it. Such are the inexorable laws of karma.

When the interests of the few prevail over the interests of the many, it is a certainty that sooner or later things are going to fall apart.

Sweetheart deals and giveaways to developers, contractors and unions; policies that pander to poverty and punish the middle class; leaders that pay lip service to public policy and serve only themselves and the circle of lobbyists, consultants, operatives and PR manipulators who channel cash into their campaign chests -- for too long that has been the nature of LA's political system.

And yet, with the community in an uproar over plans to slash services, fire thousands of city workers, pad the payrolls of the proprietary departments, sell off the city's assets and mortgage the future with massive borrowings, the mayor and City Council still admit to no failure and engage in a charade to protect themselves no matter how many get hurt.

People should be mad, a lot angrier than they are.

They pay the bills. They do the work. They care about each other.

The unions have sat at the table and bargained for the deals they got and suggested hundreds of ways of fixing what is broken.

Community leaders have come forward with reasoned and moderate solutions only to find what passes for a dialogue with officials is nothing but a sham.

What officials have set in motion has blown up in their faces for the last six months and it will keep blowing up because what they are doing only makes matters worse.

More and more people will wake up to this reality when they find parks and libraries closed, when there's no one to respond to neighborhood eyesores or problems because city agencies are in chaos from loss of staff without any coherent strategy.

It's already happening in little ways like the closure of Mulholland Drive because the city can't afford to make the road safe even as they keep on spending on things that flatter their overblown egos.

The future is as clear as day and it's not a pretty sight.

The only question is when -- not whether -- the anger that the school board and Board of Neighborhood Commissioners faces this afternoon and the Council faces in the days ahead boils over.

Hopefully, it will be sooner rather than later because the damage they are doing gets worse every day.
One of the more fascinating aspects of City Hall's disastrous handling of the budget crisis our public servants created is the mayor and City Council's sudden discovery that waste, efficiency, mismanagement, incomprehensible policies are major problems they never addressed.

Sure, they asked for reports, studies,analysis but they never bothered to act on them because none of it mattered because they was always money for sweetheart union contracts,developers and contractors.

Those days are over and on Monday,the Council got an earful on problems like the endless duplication of computer and Internet Technology systems that don't inter-connect without heavy investment and  thousands of hours of staff time over several years.

They also found out that their heavy subsidies of $1 dollar a year rent to non-profits in city buildings costs actual money and leaves the city liable as a landlord.

These videos will be instructive in understand just how screwed up your city government is and raise the question of whether you believe they really can fix what broke.


.

.

Three (Bronx) cheers for Antonio Villaraigosa -- he boasts today that his decision to kill the Department of Neighborhood Empowerment, the central reform that went into the new City Charter a decade ago, will save $2 million.

Only $210 million to go by June 30, $483 million to go next year, and $773 million to go the year after.

Of course, the deficit will be $2 million higher by the weekend so it's not clear he achieved anything except to make it perfectly clear that his escalating assertion of powers he does not have under the Charter is as much a sign of things to come as his intention to keep Neighborhood Councils as weak and irrelevant as possible.

If the consequences were not so serious, you can have a laugh watching the City Council call in one department after another and express amazement, as they did today in their brief Monday meeting, that there are not enough mechanics to maintain police, fire and other vehicles and utterly no coordination between the many departments that service their fleets themselves.

One after another, Council members take the microphone to demand reports and studies, consolidation and reorganization.

The bureaucrats assure them that they are doing all they can with their great staffs and will set up a task force to achieve every new task assigned them even as more of their workers retire, transfer to the DWP and get layoff notices.

The same was true of the reports from the IT technocrats except they had to admit it will take years and millions of dollars to fix the dozens of different computer systems that can't communicate with one another.

It's just a made for TV unreality show so don't take any of it too seriously.

Like the mayor's elimination of the Environmental Affairs and Human Services departments on Friday and DONE on Monday, nothing is really achieved except savings on paper from the supposed elimination of jobs.

For the general managers of city departments it's a nightmare.

Last Friday, the mayor sent them a missive that requires a semanticist to understand. As best I can figure he was telling them to come up with a list of people to fire to reduce staffing by 4,000 and report how their departments would operate with up to half as many people.

And on the other hand, he said they shouldn't bother. He and the City Administrative Office would tell them which jobs and services to eliminate.

It is all chaos which should inspire Wall Street to lend the city the billions of dollars it needs to pay its bills over the next few years.

And why not? The city has assets -- many of which will be sold off in the next few months at a fire sale -- which can be seized when it fails to meet its debt obligations.

Already, many inside City Hall are murmuring that selling the P in DWP would bring in enough money to keep LA from sinking into bankruptcy.

Nobody is supposed to care about any of this as long as the garbage gets picked up.

With tree trimming, parks and youth programs, libraries, building code enforcement, community planning about to join street and sidewalk paving as obsolete city services, the average person isn't likely to get much more than that out of the city for years, if not decades, to come.

Fortunately, the mayor is protecting the cops and firefighters for which we should all be grateful since they will likely be needed more than ever as the quality of life declines, jobs keep disappearing and the poor become ever more restless.

If this was a stock market crash instead of a city burning in the failure of its leadership, you would be hearing cries across the city from homeowners and business owners of sell, sell, sell.

But who is there to buy?





 
What you are seeing in the LA bankruptcy melodrama is a calculated and deliberate effort of the Mayor and his colleagues on the City Council to silence the voice of the people.

It is a hopeless task.

The silent majority is awakening and beginning to realize that what is at stake in this crisis of confidence is their jobs and property, their businesses, their hopes for a better tomorrow for their families, the future of the city they call home.

Neighborhood Councils whetted the appetite of thousands of people from all walks of life for a say in their government, for policies that improve their lives and communities, for a measure of power.

It was supposed to take 25 years before NCs were able to flex their muscles and provide the margin that defeated the solar energy fraud Measure B and elected Carmen Trutanich and Paul Krekorian to office.

When the threat of secession by San Pedro, Hollywood and the San Fernando Valley loomed leaders in the civic culture of the city proposed a system of boroughs the governed large chunks of the city and send their best to the full City Council.

Unions and other special interests watered that down to elected Neighborhood Councils with first authority over land use issues and then drowned it with powerless Councils self-selected by anyone who chose to call themselves a stakeholder.

And still the good and decent people who for so long had worked for reform accepted that as a place to stand to begin to move City Hall.
Editor's Note: Since the Dog Trainer and the Green Sheet don't have enough reporters, Bruno thought he'd help out with a preview of the big story that will break in the next few days.

LA Mayor Eliminates Police and Fire Departments


LOS ANGELES - In his latest cost-cutting move to deal with the city's financial crisis, Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa has announced he was shuttering both the Los Angeles Police and Fire Departments.
Thumbnail image for Thumbnail image for bruno4.JPG
The announcement follows the closure of Los Angeles International Airport and the Port of Los Angeles.

"I have great faith in Angelenos," the mayor said on the lawn of Getty House, which he recently converted into a medicinal marijuana clinic to raise money for the city's general fund..
"I've already eliminated crime in the city and anybody with a garden hose can put out a fire."

The mayor said he wasn't sure how much money would be saved by firing the cops and firefighters/

"I've never been good at math," Villaraigosa said. "But I'm sure it will help."

The majority of police officers, who will be allowed to keep their uniforms, were expected to be hired by movie and television production companies to block traffic on city streets during filming.

"Maybe the firefighters can do dog food commercials," the mayor said somewhat bitterly, referring to the $3 million it cost to settle Firefighter Tennie Pierce's lawsuit.

Community leaders were quick to react.

"It's alright with us as long as he doesn't screw around with Neighborhood Councils," said an anonymous source involved with the councils who feared retaliation if identified.  "He needs to keep his priorities straight."

Analysts said the mayor and the City Council have confused the public by ignoring the growing financial crisis for years, and then taking action some saw as "drastic."

 "I don't remember anything this bad since the Yorty administration," said Sherry Bebich Jeffe, a senior fellow at the School of Policy, Planning, and Development at the University of Southern California and the political analyst for KNBC.

"It makes you wonder what's worse: a goof ball or a sleaze ball?"
Her name is Dr. Angel Barrett. She is the principal of Plummer Street Elementary School in North Hills, one of the city's poorest and most gang-infested neighborhoods. Yet, Plummer Street has become a model of what can be achieved in a 60-year-old school with trailers for classrooms despite all the challenges.

Read Chelsea Cody's Special Report on OurLA.org.


At the meeting Friday with Neighborhood Council leaders, Deputy Mayor Larry Frank announced that the Department of Neighborhood Empowerment will be abolished and nearly all its staff eliminated.

DONE Commissioner and NC leader Al Abrams sent out an email Saturday explaining what the mayor's plan is. Go to OurLA.org and read what happened.
So it's come to this: Would we better off if Walter Moore or even Zuma Dogg bad beaten Antonio a year ago?

I can say with certainty that we wouldn't be worse off.waltermore.jpg
Think about it: The Mayor with 10 times the money as the other nine candidates narrowly won re-election and then spent the next 11 months traveling the world, wining and dining in restaurants only 1 percent of the people can afford, and living the life of a multimillionaire with bodyguards and servants nursing to his every whim.

zumaAV.jpgTime and again, he was told the city's finances were in desperate shape and yet he paid no attention and kept on spending the public's money as if there were no tomorrow on sweetheart deals with unions and subsidizing luxury hotels and entertainments, expanding social welfare programs.

And all he's offered is a blueprint for disaster, a strategy to do the bidding of Wall Street so he can borrow billions of dollars to conceal his failure while perpetuating the decline of the city for decades to come.

Tomorrow has already come and the bills are already coming due and all we get is a City Council following along this road to ruin like sheep. Their solutions are to fire 4,000 workers on top of the 2,400 handsomely paid off to retire -- and all of them coming out of the 12,000 city workers who provide services to the general public at libraries, parks, community planning, building code enforcement.

City Hall is in chaos, our elected officials are in a panic and thinking only of themselves and their own luxurious lives even as poverty rates are soaring, unemployment is among the highest in the nation, property values declining, storefronts empty, homes being foreclosed with parks and libraries shutting down after fortunes were spent to build them.

They have betrayed the public trust but are without shame because we still treat them with a measure of respect they do not deserve when we should be storming City Hall by thousands and demanding a new deal because the one on the table stinks.

So I ask again: Would we better off if the Mayor and the Council were gone and we started all over again with a new set of faces drawn? You certainly could not be worse off.







They have gone too far this time -- now it's not 1,000 or 2,000 or even the mayor's 3,000 layoffs.

It's 4,000 -- fully one-third of the narrow band of the 12,000 workers who they have deemed eligible for job eliminations

The other 40,000 city workers are exempted because they are in public safety, health and other social services or work for the Harbor, Airport or DWP.

We spent billions for libraries and parks, pay through the teeth for everything we get and now we will get nothing at all.

Wall Street says they must act to borrow the billions they need to get through this year and next so they have to gut the heart of the city.

They had their chance back in June when they knew the Early Retirement Incentive Program for 2,400 senior staffers was unaffordable but they gave the unions what they wanted.

They had their chance in October when they gave the unions all the power in exchange for concessions they didn't even get them through December?

They balked at 1,000 layoffs so the mayor pretended he had the power to order them. So they figured out how to transfer most of those workers to payrolls that got them off the general fund.

He upped the ante to 2,000 then 3,000 layoffs and the unions said they had a four-month-old contract that protected them.

So the Council one-upped the mayor on Thursday and took it to 4,000 in a back room meeting and tried to squelch all debate. No study, no public discussion, no rhyme or reason except to bluff the unions back to the bargaining table in hopes they will make more concessions.

Fat chance. It's a game of bluff and we will all lose. Those responsible must pay the price.
r
It's so much easier to do the wrong thing than the right thing. The LA City Ethics Commission is a case in point. a perpetual one at that since it almost always does the wrong thing, or nothing at all.

In light of the Supreme Court's abolishing laws barring corporations and unions from spending as much as they want directly out of their treasuries, the City Ethics Commission responded barely two week later by abolishing all restraints on their ability to buy elections. Not that they had any trouble doing so in the past.

What they didn't engage -- what they have never engaged -- is various proposals from full public financing to complete and immediate full disclosure to make city elections fair and democratic.

The failure of city ethics laws to protect the public interest is the single most important reason why our elected officials have failed to serve the public interest for so long, why we have a fiscal crisis of such enormous proportions, why public services are being gutted and why the policies the mayor and City Council are enacting will lead to bankruptcy or the perpetuation of this crisis for decades to come.

Personally, I like all our elected officials and think they are decent people at heart. Of course, I feel that way about some murderers and mobsters I've known.

But they are beholden for their high stations and ridiculously high salaries to the unions and corporations that get them elected. So they routinely sell out the public interest to those special interests and, for the most part, don't even see that what they are doing is wrong.

To residents looking in, their actions seem incompetent if not corrupt, a betrayal of the public trust. But within the bubble of consciousness at City Hall, it all seems normal.

Incumbents routinely win re-election against no opposition or virtually no opposition because all the campaign cash flows to them. They vote unanimously on almost all things and Council members who dare to speak with an independent voice put at risk their ability to look after their constituents' needs and to achieve their own goals for the city.

It is a tight system and it has failed so badly that a groundswell is building to recall all 15 Council members and the Mayor, Controller and City Attorney as well.

I am participating in a forum on campaign finance reform in the City Hall Chambers at 9 a.m. on March 4. Councilman Jose Huizar is moderating and other panelists include Kathy Feng of Common Cause, Bob Stern of the Center for Governmental Studies, Xandra Kayden of the League of Women Voters LeeAnn Pelham of the City Ethics Commission and James Sutton of Campaign Lawyers.

Notably absent from the group is a representative of the Clean Money Campaign that seeks full public financing.

My own view is there's never been a law that can clean up our political campaigns and never will be. Smart lawyers for special interests will always find a way around them just as they did McCain-Feingold.

The Supreme Court has ruled money is part of free speech. So be it.

What we could do is require that all contributions be listed on the Ethics Commission website within 72 hours of being received with complete disclosure of what the financial interests are of contributors with regard to city business.

Penalties need to be stiffened considerably and appointments to the Ethics Commission need to be balanced by giving Neighborhood Councils the power to name one or more members, something that should be done on all commissions.

With full and immediate disclosure, the free speech issue would truly be brought to life.

Instead of waiting six months to find out who gave money without any indication of their interests, the public and the press would have the opportunity in real time to create a public discussion that inhibit many of the back room deals that now rarely come out, or come out long after they can impact elections.



EDITOR'S NOTE: This article was written for the February edition of Nina Royal's North Valley Reporter.

The most dangerous thing a politician can do is to raise the people's expectations - just ask Antonio Villaraigosa what happens when you promise voters a dream come true and deliver a nightmare.

Paul Krekorian won election as the Council member for District 2 in the East San Fernando by convincing voters from Sunland-Tujunga to Sherman Oaks he would be a true public servant and meet their needs within the region and carry their values and interests into City Hall.

His first days in office were marked by a whirlwind of activity, immediately wading into the controversy over the Magnolia Project in Valley Village in search of a compromise, saving the McGroarty Oaks in Sunland-Tujunga from being destroyed for an unwanted road project, and reopening a park in North Hollywood.

Constituent services and local issues are the bread-and-butter of elective office. The tougher task is being able to affect the course of broader citywide issues - the budget, DWP policy, planning - in a City Hall political system that has run amok.

The City Council demands unanimity these days on almost all things of importance and those who get out of line usually find it is difficult, if not impossible, to get support for the needs of the people in their districts.

That's the challenge Krekorian faces: Can he stand up for his ideals and fulfill his promises when all around him are men and women who have succumbed to back room deals and sold their consciences to special interests?
EDITOR'S NOTE: This article was written for the February edition of Wayne Adelstein's North Valley Community Newspapers. Here's a link to a new Wall Street Journal article on municipal bankruptcies across America.


Times are tough and there going to get tougher so it's come down to this: We need to drop the country club membership, sell off the cars, hold a yard sale for everything but  basic essentials, get rid of the gardener, pool man and maid, borrow every cent we can whatever the interest rate - and pray for a miracle.

A lot of people are in that spot these days and so are we all as the day of reckoning is at hand for Los Angeles and California after decades of living beyond our means

The unspeakable B-word, bankruptcy, is now on the lips of everyone even the city's politicians who have been living high in a fantasyland where they actually believed they could redistribute the wealth of the middle class to the rich and poor without consequences.

The facts are these: Halfway through the fiscal year, the city has a $186 million deficit, and conservatively estimates next year's at $400 million, $725 million the following year, $875 million the next, and more than $1 billion in 2013-14 - equal to roughly 25 percent of the operating budget.

We, collectively, are in the same boat as a lot of individuals who mismanaged their financial affairs, ignored all the warning signs and sound advice and hit a streak of bad luck.
The result is there are only two alternatives: Bankruptcy or facing the truth ourselves and developing a plan of action to get us through this crisis.

Finally, the mayor and City Council say they are ready to do that after a year in which the steps they took - sweetened pensions and payoffs to city workers who retire early and sweetheart long-term contracts for city workers who stay - have made the problems worse, not better.

And now as the reality of what they have done strikes home, they are proposing this solution:

Beg the unions to agree to layoffs and reopen contract talks, raises rates and fees wherever they can, find the courage to actually manage city operations and privatize golf courses, the zoo, convention center, parking structures and meters, information technology, property management and Van Nuys and Ontario airports.

Can selling off the 1,300 acres of Chatsworth Reservoir, the DWP and LAX be far behind? You can be sure they would if they could.
"I'm being perfectly honest with you, I have very serious concerns about how the city is going to be able to deliver services." -- Maggie Whelan, General Manager, Personnel Department, City of Los Angeles.



Leave it to the bureaucrats to talk truth to power, even when those in power do not listen and cannot see.

Today, our LA civic hero is a woman who has seen it all at City Hall, the longest serving general manager in a system of government that turns over its management for the slightest political whims.

Many who survived have given up entirely but there are some whose skills and detachment have allowed them to keep the system running despite the muddling and meddling from above and   still preserve a measure of integrity and the ability to speak honestly, in a nice manner, to be sure.

Maggie Whelan is one of the best of those and her performance Wednesday before her City Council masters was an exhibition that should be watched closely to see what it takes to do a good job when all around you are those who could care less.

Bernard Parks was her straight man, giving nothing away in his expressions as he drew out the truth of what hell his colleagues have wrought with questions that begat facts, a dose of reality. Like Whelan, he spent his career in the stifled culture of City Hall and thrived until, in his case, he thought being Chief of  Police, actually meant he was the Chief.
 
If your attention span ends here, this is all you need to know.

In response to Parks' deliberately convoluted questions about the chaos caused by the shotgun approach of early retirements, the total confusion caused by layoffs where no one actually loses their jobs and a fiscal crisis that gets worse by the day, Whelan offered these words of wisdom:

"I'm being perfectly honest with you, I have very serious concerns about how the city is going to be able to deliver services. perfectly honest with you, I have very serious concerns about how the city is going to be able to deliver services."

There it is. If Maggie Whelan whose job it is to juggle the 52,000 full-time employees into a functioning city government, doesn't know how LA is going to deliver services, nobody does.

Certainly not the mayor who has done nothing except put 4,000 more workers on the payroll and into the bankrupt pensions plans and spent money as fast as he made hollow promises.

Two weeks ago he awakened from his long disengagement from his job of leading the city and exercised powers no one knew he had to order 1,000 job eliminations immediately.

It was a trick since the goal was to transfer most of them to special funds, Harbor, Airport and DWP jobs. Only 160 have been transferred out of more than 2,000 applicants who jumped at the chance to escape what was going on and, as Whelan notes, not a single worker has been laid off.

It was as if she were speaking in a dead language like Sanskrit. The reality didn't matter.The Council is moving forward relentlessly to carry out a plan that in the end will lead to even worse financial troubles, and losses in services that will damage the quality of life for millions and jeopardize the future of the city.

Don't take my word for it. Watch Maggie Whelan closely for the four minutes of this video and hear what she is really saying. And if you really want to understand what is going on more deeply, watch the full video at the City Clerk's site. .
The long-awaited day has finally arrived and the mayor earned his star on the Walk of Fame and a SAG card as well, just in case he needs a job one of these days. And that's exactly what he went to Pine Valley on ABC's soap opera "All My Children" to get: Jobs, Jobs, Jobs.

ABC's soap opera "All My Children" to get: Jobs, Jobs, Jobs.

The threads of the story have become so entangled it's like a crazy dream that is so vivid you think it's reality.

How dumb do they think we are?

That's the question that has come to mind thousands of times over the years as I've observed the insanity that passes for our local government.

Today, what came to mind for the first time is "How dumb are we?"

The evidence is mounting everywhere that it's us who are out of our minds, not them. They are just selfish little people who will do and say anything to protect and serve themselves. We are the fools who keep on paying the bills and electing them to office.

They conned us into paying billions, nearly $20 billion, to build mammoth monuments to miseducation that cost as much as $400 million each but now can't pay the salaries of teachers to staff them so they want another tax for that.

It was all for the "sake of the children," they said, so we taxed ourselves to build parks and libraries that will soon be shuttered.

But they've got money lying around to build yet another park to connect City Hall with the DWP, presumably so city and county workers will have a place to nap in the daytime and the homeless to sleep at night since they've been rousted from Skid Row so developers given huge subsidies can build luxury apartments that no one can afford.

How dumb are we?

I'll tell you how dumb we are, we borrow a fortune to build a new Convention Center because the old one is a bust and subsidize it to the tune of $40 million a year and then when it starts making money, we are going to sell it to the billionaire who is getting even richer on Staples Center and LA Live that were built with our generosity to provide playgrounds for the rich.

We give slick operators like the CIM Group everything they want and when their deals flop, like Hollywood and Highland, we bail them out.

We cut secret sweetheart deals with the emirs of Dubai and New York billionaires for the Grandiose Avenue Project and we forgive them millions in penalties when they don't deliver.

We watch our elected officials beating their breasts because their incompetence and cowardice puts the future of our city in jeopardy and sit silent as they piously talk about firing contractors and their workers to save the jobs of city workers they no longer can afford to pay. It would be wrong, they say, to make our horrifying unemployment numbers worse even as they make them worse.

Oh, the horror, the horror...

But instead of storming their palace of self-service, we come as peasants begging for a crumb from their lavish marble and gold table.

We are fools. We are dumb. We are slaves and they are masters. We have gotten what we deserve.

Nothing will change until we -- business, labor and the community -- get up off our knees and stand up like free men and women and show them who's boss, show them we will not be fooled  any longer.
Janice Hahn's little conflict of interest problem in deciding to step in as the unbiased mediator of a dispute between Gambol Industries and LA Harbor officials over a $50 million shipbuilding project offers a window into the way City Hall so often does business.

It's not what you know but who you know.

In the Councilwoman's case, the person she knows and knows well is Gwen Butterfield, president and CEO of Butterfield Communication, a public relations firm. They have been friendsbutterfield.jpg a long time, good enough friends that acquaintances say Janice was maid-of-honor at Gwen's wedding.

When Hahn was sworn into office on July 1, 2001, at the same time her brother Jim was sworn in as Mayor, it was Butterfield who the LA Times found worthy as voice of the community to put the event into perspective.

"I think it is truly history in the making," said Gwen Butterfield, close friend and campaign +volunteer for Janice Hahn. "She's so excited . . . to have her brother swearing her in."

Butterfield's own life took a decided turn upwards with the arrival of Janice became chair of the powerful  committee that oversees the Harbor Department.

She's doing a lot of business and has been a registered City Hall lobbyist for the last six years, with five clients showing up on her disclosure statement.

It should come as no surprise that are all about the Harbor: Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railway, Cabrillo Beach Yacht Club, Pacific L.A. Marine Terminal, LLC, Wallenius Wilhelmsenn Logistics and most of all, Gambol Industries which port insiders say has made her a very well-to-do woman, turning a modest living as a community organizer and part-time advocate into a PR/lobbying business with a half-million-dollars in billings.

The friendship also has been good for the Hahn's fund-raising efforts.

Ijanicehahn4.jpgn breaking the story on Hahn's conflict-of-interest, Art Marroquin of the Daily Breeze reported
Gambol's president, Robert Stein, contributed $6,500 to Hahn's lieutenant governor campaign account last October and $500 to her City Council officeholder's account last August.

"Additionally, the Los Angeles-based law firm of Jeffer, Mangels, Butler and Marmaro is representing Gambol Industries in the ongoing negotiations with the port and contributed $5,000 to Hahn's campaign for lieutenant governor last September."

"That's $!2,000 worth of conflict," the Daily Breeze editorialized after Hahn reluctantly backed out of serving a mediator for the Gambol proposal which Harbor officials opposed because it would seriously delay a critical dredging proposal.

"The perception -- one of bias -- would be everything. Always there, it would cast a pall not only over the deal at the port but also over the support and opposition she has in the Harbor Area communities where she is best known. And that would cast shadows over her own future ambitions, which are, right now, pretty big. "

Butterfield herself has contributed nearly $13,000 over the years to Hahn and more than half a dozen other Butterfield clients have been equally generous in backing Hahn's political ambitions generously, according to city ethics records.

Like so much of what goes on the threads of relationships and the role of money casts a shadow over so much of what goes on. They call it "access" -- the access routinely denied the public or limited to two minutes of public comment -- but really it's corruption whether it's just in appearance, whether it's criminal or not.

In this case, the threads reach the LA Conservancy, which too benefited from Gambol's money, and sent to bat for the company in its fight with the Harbor Department.
EDITOR'S NOTE: For your viewing pleasure, here's City Council President Eric Garcetti's entire acting performance on today's episode of "All My Children." Tomorrow, it's the mayor himself, will he cut a back room deal?


One of the great advantages of being a dog columnist is that there are lots of dogs out there willing to help me out.
Thumbnail image for bruno4.JPG
Many of my four-legged friends are fans - I think frequent commenter G. Shepard has the hots for me - and a few are terrific sources.

Very Important people have dogs, or have ex-beauty queen turned TV news reporter girlfriends with dogs. (I try to get Lu Parker and the adorable Monkey in every post.)

And I'm not saying Monkey's my source, although there is some concern in Getty House about Antonio messing around this week with Susan Lucci in Wednesday's episode of "All My Children," but I have come into possession of a portion of the script that wasn't used.

As everyone knows, Lucci, who's been on the show longer than Antonio's been alive, plays Erika Kane.

Woof!

Antonio and Jay Carson, his chief deputy mayor and former HIllary Clinton presidential campaign spokesman, enter Confusion, a new club in Pine Valley.  Erika Kane, the club's aging, but still beautiful owner, is talking to a group on the other side of the crowded room.

Antonio:  Give me a breath strip.

Carson:   What flavor?

Antonio:  What did Clinton like?

Carson:  He liked red.

Antonio: I'll have red then.

Carson mutters to himself as he rummages through his expensive leather shoulder bag, finds the cinnamon breath strips and hands them to the mayor.

Antonio: (Looking around) Remind me why we're here?

Carson:  We're here because we're stuck in freaking Pine Valley for a National Conference of Mayors meeting and this is the only place in town with decent wine. (Under his breath)  At least Clinton went to decent cities.

Antonio: I heard that! Listen, you don't work for him anymore.  You work for me now.

Carson:
  I know. But if Hillary hadn't screwed up Iowa, I'd be in the White House with The Man!
 
Antonio: He wasn't running.

Carson
:  That's how much you know, Tony.

Antonio
:  I've told you a hundred times ... don't call me Tony!

Erika Kane notices Antonio and Carson, excuses herself from her guests and walks across the room to greet them.  She extends her hand to Carson.

Erika:  (Enthusiastically) Hello, mayor!  I'm Erika Kane.  Welcome to Confusion.

Carson:
  Uhh, hello, Miss Kane, but I'm not the mayor. (Looking at Antonio) This is Mayor Villaraigosa.

Erika: 
Oh, I'm sorry. (Shaking Antonio's hand) Hello, Mayor Villa-rah-ag-ro-rossa.  Welcome to Confusion!

Antonio:
  I'm not confused. Who said I was confused?

Erika:
  No, mayor.  The club. It's called Confusion.  I'm so glad you could join us.

Antonio:
Can I see a wine list?

Carson: (Again, under his breath) Jesus, what have I done?

I guess Lu Parker's PR firm forgot to send the release to Bruno. I wonder why?
bruno4.JPG
I had to read in the former Green Sheet this morning that It Girl Public Relations - gosh, I hope the "it' part isn't a typo - is out trying to stir up some media interest in our mayor's latest TV newshound girlfriend.

Wait a doggone minute!  Who's covered her and her adorable pup, Monkey, more closely than me?

But noooooo, I have to find out about the PR campaign from City Hall Dean (a nice way of saying  "really old") Rick Orlov:

"In a letter to try to get a feature story on Parker, It Girl talks about her having been a Miss USA, her animal rights activism, her work as a KTLA television reporter, actress and author, and, oh by the way, how she has convinced her boyfriend-mayor to have meatless Mondays.
"Accompanying the pitch were several pictures of Parker, including one with Villaraigosa and her dog"

Meatless Mondays? I've already covered that part of the kennel, and, by the way, how do we know Antonio's even sticking to it?  He has been known to cheat, if you get what I mean.

And by the way, I'm told Lu first suggested "Wineless Wednesdays" to our mayor, but he just laughed at that idea.

Not eating dead animals is one thing - it prevents him from becoming Mayor Pudgaraigosa -- but vintage dead grapes, especially in incredibly expensive bottles bought by billionaire pals, are another thing entirely.

If the folks at It Girl PR still want to pitch me, I'm available.

I suggest they play up the Monkey angle for obvious reasons, invite me to lunch, promise to bring along Lu, Monkey and Antonio, schedule it for a Monday at a great steakhouse like the The Palm and make the mayor eat just broccoli.

I'll bring a photographer.

Woof!




The clock is ticking on the mayor's plan to gut city services and sell its assets, and every day the City Council dawdles revenue falls and the budget deficit grows by nearly $340,000.

On Saturday, activists at the Saving LA Project meeting discussed the issue of what is in the best interests of the community as a whole and the city's workforce and reached a consensus.

No Layoffs of city workers, because every worker eliminated from the general fund or transferred to the Harbor, Airport or DWP means less service for the city's four million residents, the people who pay the bills.

No Payoffs like the early retirement plan that is getting rid of nearly 3,000 senior city staff or the kind of deals our elected officials cut with contributors and special interests, deals that have allowed billboards, pot shops and over-sized developments to pop up everywhere.

No Selloffs of parking lots and meters, the zoo, golf courses, the convention center, airports, even the power system they are now talking about -- deals that based on past performance will surely benefit the few at the expense of the many.

The budget plan put forward by the CAO's office on instructions of the mayor and Council leadership is nothing but a hodgepodge of gimmicks that punish city workers and slash city services in order to cook the books so they can borrow billions to have the cash to get through this financial year and next.

The so-called restructuring plan -- like the ERIP and layoff strategies -- is nothing but a shotgun approach to effective and efficient government.

There is no coherent logic to the strategy, no details of what they really intend to do, no idea of how it impacts departments and the ability to provide basic services. Parks, libraries, planning, building code enforcement will be decimated. The City Attorney's ability to prosecute criminals, solve neighborhood problems and defend the city against nearly $1 billion in lawsuits, mainly of the frivolous, will be undermined.

There are no negotiations with the unions or effort to implement their cost-saving strategies.

There is no engagement of community leaders or respect being shown to the public or their needs.

There is no plan, just a desperate attempt to defer cleaning up the budgetary mess they created in the vain hope that somehow a miracle will save them from wrath of the people.

There is another way.

Bring community, union and business leaders to the table and come up with real solutions that actually solve the fundamental problems and get LA moving forward again.

Those are the views of SLAP activists and many others I have spoken with.

My own view is that city workers in all departments need to take a step back financially and the public needs to take a step forward to provide a new revenue source for two or three years to bring the budget into balance without destroying our human capital, our services infrastructure.

I have run this idea past dozens of people in the political and civic culture of LA and the response is unanimous: No one will support higher taxes because they don't trust the city's leadership.

That I think goes to the heart of the matter. The financial troubles facing LA are simply the monetary manifestation of the loss of confidence and trust in our leaders.

The only real solution is to bring us all together to find a consensus. It may involve unions' and the community giving ground but it will produce a transparent strategy that will create a new spirit of LA, mutual respect and trust.

The alternative is to see more jobs disappear, the value of property and businesses continue to decline and the acceleration of middle class flight.

Stop the nonsense. Let your voice be heard. We want real solutions, not gimmicks.
No matter how bleak the future looks, LA City Council members still live in a champagne and caviar world where money is no object.

There's little things coming up today as they diligently show up to work every day to get their marching orders on the plan to stave off bankruptcy.

Little things like authorizing $576 in overtime for city workers for a an AQMD meeting at Van Nuys City Hall and $72,,340 in back pay to 14 DWP workers who somehow got left out of all the lump sum cash payments, bonuses and handsome raises bestowed on the nation's best paid utility workers.

No doubt each of these lucky 14 getting an average of $5,000 each is indispensable to the DWP's functioning no matter how high the rates go, no matter how many libraries and parks close, no matter how basic services are gutted.

What would we do without these people: Administrative Intern (3 yrs. college), Administrative Intern (4 yrs. College), Cashier Water and Power, Construction Inspector, Engineering Specialist, Law Clerk. Occupational Trainee I, Occupational Trainee II, Records Management Officer, Relief Retirement Worker, Senior Personnel Analyst I, Senior Personnel Analyst II, Seasonal Meter Reader, Student Engineer I (1 yr. Eng. Edu.), Student Engineer II (2 yrs. Eng. Edu.), Student Engineer III (3 yrs. Eng. Edu.), Student Engineer IV (Sr. Eng. Student), Student Professional Worker, Student Trainee Worker, Student Worker.

You can bet your bottom dollar, or more precisely pay your last dollar to the DWP, that hundreds if not thousands of jobs like these will be filled in the coming months at the DWP, Harbor and Airport by city workers paid from the general fund who are seeing their jobs being "eliminated" -- what City Hall calls "layoffs."

But the boondoggle of boondoggles -- at least for today -- is Councilmen Bill Rosendahl's and Paul Koretz's proposal to spend $30 million to build a two-mile bike path from "Temescal Canyon Beach parking lot to Coastline Drive to provide a breathtaking view of the ocean and allow bicyclists to avoid riding on Pacific Coast Highway."

To hell with public safety, with the needs of the disabled, youth programs and everything else, the Council today wants to spend $15 million a mile for "a breathtaking view" of the ocean for cyclists.

This is the "Bikepath to Nowhere" -- Sarah Palin and her fellow Alaskans would be proud that their "Bridge to Nowhere" has company.

What could they be thinking when cycling enthusiasts have proposed Backbone Bikeway Network that would cost $28,000 a mile to provide a vast connected system of safe bike paths that would serve tens of thousands of cyclists, but they can't get to first base.

Rosendahl and Koretz, in their Westside elitism, prefer to commit the City of Los Angeles to make this Bikepath to Nowhere a key part of the legislative agenda.

Their goal is to extend the "Marvin Braude Beach Bike Path runs approximately 19 miles along the beach and ends at Potrero Canyon and continues as an asphalt path toward the Bel Air Bay Club."

Isn't that enough beautiful coastal scenery for bikers? Or do they think that instead of joining gangs because their neighborhood parks that are closed, inner-city kids will ride their fancy bikes out to the beach to catch two more miles of ocean vistas?

But why quibble about priorities when "with the concurrence of the Mayor ...  the City of Los Angeles hereby includes in its 2009-2010 Federal Legislative Program SPONSORSHIP andlor SUPPORT for legislation or administrative action to provide funding to extend the Marvin Braude Bike Path," as the Councilmen put it in their motion.

Things like this don't just come out of the blue.

They happen with the full concurrence of the bureaucracy after study and thought. In this case, it's Chief Legislative Analyst Gerry Miller whose endorsement make the unthinkable so thinkable.

You can be sure this matter will be dispensed with and move forward quickly so the Council can give its full attention to privatizing everything they can, finding jobs for every city worker, raising every tax, rate, fee and fine they can and borrowing against the future to pay for current expenses like the massive liability claims the city faces for incompetent leadership and management..
Thursday night's SoCal Connected hosted by Val Zavala led with Judy Muller's report on LA's budget crisis. Jack Humphreville and I provided the community voices. Here's the video:

Thumbnail image for Thumbnail image for Thumbnail image for Thumbnail image for Thumbnail image for Thumbnail image for Thumbnail image for Thumbnail image for Thumbnail image for Thumbnail image for Thumbnail image for Thumbnail image for Thumbnail imageThis dog once had what you people call "puppy love" for Janice Hahn.

When I was, indeed, just a pup, I'd hang out at the port with those tough longshoremen, who didn't care that I wasn't all that cute. They were pretty ugly, too.

Janice lives in San Pedro and represents it on the City Council. I'd see her around town.  She was always just soooo nice - very perky! -- and so well groomed, something I couldn't say for all the women down there.  Tattoos on women have been stylish in San Pedro since WWII.

Now, I'm heartbroken.  But because I'm not really housebroken, I'm going to come out and say it:  Janice Hahn may be the dumbest person to ever hold office in Los Angeles - and if you know your LA history, that's pretty freaking scary.

Earlier this week, I got on her for trying to pull a fast one with her City Council/Lieutenant Governor's campaign web sites.  Then I teased her for posing in a newspaper photo with former Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld, who isn't exactly the kind of guy you want endorsing you in a Democratic primary for statewide office.

But both of those are small kibble compared to the dumb-ass doozy detailed today in the Daily Breeze. Get a load of the first three paragraphs of Art Marroquin's story:

"The president of a ship-building business donated at least $7,000 to Los Angeles City Councilwoman Janice Hahn, who was expected this month to mediate a dispute between the company and the Port of Los Angeles.

"Hahn was set to step in as an impartial arbitrator amid the ongoing debate between port officials and Long Beach-based Gambol Industries, which has tried since last spring to open a $50 million shipyard on Terminal Island.

"Gambol's president, Robert Stein, contributed $6,500 to Hahn's lieutenant governor campaign account last October and another $500 to her City Council officeholder's account last August, according to online state and city filing records."


Yes, you read it right!  Janice took all this dough - and then figured nobody would blink if she decided the fate of this guy's $50 million (!!!) project.  A call from a reporter inspired her to change her mind.

When this dog called her out publicly on the web site screw up, her staff politely explained it was just an innocent mistake: all this Internet stuff is just sooooo confusing.

I suppose ethics is way too confusing, too.  Gosh, there are just soooooo many rules. And the appearance of a conflict being as bad as conflict, well, forget it.  There are just soooooo many confusing words.

Woof!


The City Council is meeting every day now to wring their hands and cry "Woe is us" as if the global recession, the abysmal failure of their colleagues in Sacramento or some act of God were responsible for the calamity facing LA.

The closest anyone at City Hall has come to taking any responsibility is when the mayor inadvertently slipped up Tuesday and admitted during his Council appearance: "We all took too long. They took too long in their negotiations, and saying 'no' to virtually everything. We took too long in not making a tough decision."

It's hard to believe anyone could tell so many lies around one little half-truth in so few words.
Took too long? Three years isn't too long, it's an eternity when housing prices have been dropping by 40 percent and thousands of people are losing their homes, when hundreds of thousands of residents are losing their jobs, when businesses are going bankrupt by the hundreds, when the lines are going around the block at food banks.

Let's be clear, the unions didn't take too long. They negotiated for a year with city officials before a sweetheart deal was cut for early retirements. They didn't say 'no' to virtually everything. They proposed dozens of ways to cut costs and raise revenues.

It's the mayor and Council who didn't say 'no' to virtually anything.
They were told over and over in public and in private by city budget experts that revenues were falling sharply over a long period of time and wouldn't recover for many years.

The mayor knew with absolute certainty that the ERIP deal he signed on June 26 was unaffordable. And so did the Council. They knew the budget deficit would only get worse year after year, growing to more than $1 billion with more than $10 billion in bills coming due for pensions.

They knew in August just how bad the retirement deal was and spent the next six weeks cutting another deal with the unions that was even worse, promising to make them whole financially within five years for giving $78 million in concessions to close a $500 million deficit.

Just how bad it was is only coming out now thanks to the letter the unions sent to the mayor and council on Wednesday. In the face of looming catastrophe, they promised the workers the moon and stars to give them a fig leaf to cover the shame of their failed leadership.

Their failure to act decisively stalled any savings for months as the deficit grew by $1 million a day to $2 million a day even as revenue estimates were shockingly off the mark by huge factors.

Now, the mayor has the nerve to claim they didn't realize there was a problem until December. It's just another lie.

The biggest lie of all is that they "waited too long in not making a tough decision."
 
They still haven't given the slightest indication they intend to make any tough decisions.

They are still taking the easy way out.

They are pretending to lay off workers when the deal they cut in September requires them to be transferred to special funds and proprietary departments whether their services are needed or they are qualified for the jobs.

They are preparing to borrow billions of dollars that mortgage the city's future even as they sell off parking structures, parking meters, the zoo, convention center, Ontario Airport and everything else they can, stripping the city of its future revenue sources.

They are scheming to raise taxes, fees and rates and even strip the public of basic civil liberties turning every kind of violation and citation into an administrative action that denies the right to a trial.

This would be the stuff of farce if the consequences were not so tragic.

Gutting public services, punishing the poor, driving away good jobs -- we are on the road to becoming a city of stark contrasts between rich and poor, subsidized luxury hotels and entertainment districts and slums, a city without a middle class, a failed city.

We all share in responsibility for this with our indifference and apathy, our ignorance and our selfishness. Business interests,  the community, the disabled, the artsy crowd -- they are all lined up begging to protect their own interests just like the unions.

They are playing right into the hands of the mayor and Council who will do anything to avoid taking responsibility for the harm they have caused.

They are shameless and incompetent. They are liars and self-servers. They have betrayed the public trust and the public is complicit.

Woe is us.

(Editor's Note: This article was submitted to the LA Times Opinion Page Editor a week ago but still has not gotten a response rejecting or accepting it, so it's yours for free)

To paraphrase President Obama in his State of the Union speech, democracy in a city of four million people can be noisy and messy and complicated.

That was evident this (last) week in Los Angeles in a way that we have rarely seen as people from all over the city, from all walks of life, paraded before the City Council to plead their case for their jobs, for funding for their causes, for understanding of their needs.

It was noisy and messy and surely the financial and spiritual crisis facing the city is complicated.

But the earnestness and passion of the disabled, of neighborhood activists, of environmentalists, of city workers, of lovers of art and culture, of youth, of the LGBT community and so many others was a demonstration of the underlying vitality of the people and their yearning for a city that works for them.

Their energy is the fertile ground on which great cities grow. It is the grassroots of democracy, a complex web of often competing needs, values and interests that, if nurtured, can bloom into a community enriched by their diversity.

It's the nurturing that's the problem in Los Angeles and always has been.

This is a city that throughout its history has been run from the top down by elites that have looked down at those below and patronizingly decided what was best for them and, of course, for themselves.

The Times in its editorial on the outcry of so many people before the Council expressed this noblesse oblige attitude by chiding them for thinking only of themselves when the city is in dire straits, having started the "new fiscal year -- irresponsibly and, more to the point, illegally -- in debt and insolvent."

The editorial suggests that a "successful" Los Angeles rely on private fund-raising and volunteerism as a "model for providing quality-of-life programs instead of support from the city.

With that, the Times gives a blanket endorsement to the proposal to restructure city government, eliminate thousands of city workers who provide services to the public and drastically reduce funding for programs like Neighborhood Councils, human services and arts and culture.

The irony is that most of the money for these efforts does come from donations and most of the work is done by thousands or ordinary people volunteering endless hours in the service of others and their communities.

City government should be in a support role for these efforts but more often than not, it is the obstacle in their way.

Instead of bringing this vast army of volunteers to the table of power and working with them to integrate their efforts with available resources, the city has brushed them off with little more than lip service.

City Administrative Officer Miguel Santana in his meticulously detailed reports to the Council and mayor demonstrated that overspending and poor management over many years has brought the city to the brink of bankruptcy.

In his public comments to the Council, he warned that his three-year plan to slash spending, reorganize the bureaucracy and sell valuable city assets is just the beginning.

The impact of the recession and the city's financial crisis is likely to last seven to 10 years, he said, and more cuts in funding and more job eliminations are inevitable.

There is no way out of this crisis without the good will of the people and that is what is missing.

The people have lost confidence in City Hall. The hundreds of people who have gone to City Hall to beg for mercy for their causes are fed up with begging for crumbs. They are demanding a full role in developing the policies and implementing the programs they care so passionately about.

It's a noisy, messy and complicated way to do business. It's called democracy, an idea that is alien to the civic and political culture of Los Angeles. But it's an idea whose time has come.

And it's the only way out of this crisis, the only way the city can pull together and flourish for years to come.

Stuff happens in life sometimes that opens your eyes to what's really going on in this evolving new world order.

My PC crashed Friday, sending me into a panic. When I finally got my wits about me and figured out how to restore it, I found I had lost numerous files I hadn't backed up. And then I botched the reinstall so I lost my wireless connection to my laptop and made matters worse trying to fix it and lost all Internet service.

After the Super Bowl, I called Time Warner Cable for support and a wonderful woman in a faraway country spent 90 minutes on the phone with me before finally deciding a serviceman would have to come to my house to fix it.

So I poured another martini and tried to go through the steps again only to find I needed support to reprogram my cable modem. It took several tries, but the next woman I spoke to got both my PC and my laptop worked directly off the cable modem.

Being obsessed at that point, I decided to try to fix my Linksys router myself and blew out the connection, leading to a third call to yet another woman in the Phillippines, India, Pakistan, somewhere in Asia I was sure.

By dawn's early light, I called Linksys and talked to Manoush in Pakistan who spent more than an hour going through one procedure after another until Voila!, I was wirelessly connected -- except gotomypc.com still didn't work.

That led to a fairly short call to gotomypc support where a nice young woman somewhere, maybe even in America but I doubt it, assured me it was my Norton Firewall that was the problem.

Enter Pritam Prasad, the Norton support woman I reached on the phone. She didn't just guide me through the long laborious process, she took over control of my PC and spent an hour uninstalling, upgrading, reconfiguring and suddenly I was connected, fully restored.

Every person I spoke with was courteous, respectful, caring, smart, knowledgeable  and you can bet working for a fifth, a tenth, a 20th of what any of us would expect, a better class of workers than any of us would be.

I bring this up because Tezozomoc, brilliant leader of the South Central Farmers, has been pointing out of late that this isn't a recession we are going through but a major economic restructuring to the realities of the global economy. America has lost control of the means of production, the very heart of capitalism and the growth of wealth.

If you know your Karl Marx, you know how important it is to own the means of production and to have the skills that come with that ownership:


The mayor can speak for himself and so can the city financial consultants. The crisis could come to head this summer unless a long series of measures proposed by City Administrative Officer Miguel Santana because massive borrowings will be needed to get through next fiscal year.

Without sharp cuts in costs, investors will demand higher interest rates. They are looking at the reserve fund and what steps are being taken to reduce spending.

"All the investors we watch want to make they're catching a falling knife," one consultant quoted a bond underwriter as saying.


Bruno's father, Brutus, was an old-fashioned news dog in the "Front Page" tradition. He drank a lot and caroused a lot.
Thumbnail image for Thumbnail image for Thumbnail image for Thumbnail image for Thumbnail image for Thumbnail image for Thumbnail image for Thumbnail image for Thumbnail image for Thumbnail image for Thumbnail image for Thumbnail image for Thumbnail image
For a while he hung around the LA Board of Supervisors, where there was always a lot garbage lying around. They were a really comical bunch in those days thanks in no small part to the legendary news hog Supervisor Kenneth Hahn.

It was said that Kenny Hahn would attend the opening of a stop sign - then hold a news conference.  For a while, dad's editor, fed up with Kenny's attempts to get coverage, forbid his name to be mentioned in a story without his approval.

Kenny's son, San Pedro Jim, our former mayor, didn't get the news gene. In fact, he hated reporters, especially those from the Dog Trainer who once staked out his house to see if he was still living with his wife.

janicerumsfeld.jpgDuring his entire term as mayor, he never once dropped into the Daily News to boost himself.  I think my master Ron, the editor of the secessionist propaganda organ, annoyed him.

Kenny's daughter, Janice, on the other hand is a chip of the old block -- some say the blockhead part but there's no doubt others love her like they did her dad.

Ron reported yesterday she tried to pull a fast one by rigging her City Council web site to jump to her lieutenant governor's campaign page if you asked for information on, say, anything.

As Ron said, if that's not illegal, it should be. Janice has now explained she has a bit of problem with all these newfangled computers and it was a big mistake.

Do not get behind this woman in line at an ATM!

And today, a reader provides the photo of the day. There she is, the good Democratic daughter of a renowned, if wacky, Democratic father and sister of our former Democratic mayor, posing with former Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld - despised by the left for his leading us in the Iraq War.

I guess she didn't see it coming five years ago when Rummy's War was already getting old, didn't see it coming that she would be running for statewide office (who did?).. All she saw was the camera.

Kenny, who would have posed with the Unabomber if it had gotten him on the front page, must be smiling in heaven.

The other two guys in the picture are former LAPD Chief Bill Bratton, who is a little to the right of Rumsfield, and legendary political consultant Joe Cerrell, who's there because Janice is there, of course.  Joe would have represented the Unabomber if he ran for office.

Janice's opponent in the Democratic primary for lieutenant governor is State Sen. Dean Florez  from the Central Valley town of Shafter.  (Rhythms with shaft her.) You really can't make this stuff up!.

About 10 minutes after this is posted, I expect a conga line of smiling consultants to be snaking their way around Florez' campaign office.

They can send the steak bones to me in care of Ron.

Woof!




We read your post and were really shocked at what you found -- especially because we really do take every precaution not to let our official City business overlap with the campaign work.  I am adamant about it which is why this situation is particularly upsetting.

I have been working to find out what is wrong and I think we have fixed the problem.  I am not an IT person, but it has been explained to me that in short, the form  was originally set up, prior to the campaign, to operate with a database on janicehahn.com.   Before the campaign, janicehahn.com directly to our city website.  When the campaign site was built, the form was not updated with the database's new address and caused a URL error, which automatically re-directed people to the new janicehan.com main page.  I hope that makes sense.

Again, please know that this was a mistake that should have been caught by our database folks or even our ITA, but it never was.  I thank you for bringing it to our attention.

Please also feel free to call me if you ever think there is an issue like this again.  We feel very strongly about adhering to the boundaries between City business and Janice's campaign.

Courtney Chesla Torres, Chief of Staff to CD15 Councilwoman Janice Hahn
The actors are in place, costumed as the King and His Court. Hundreds of extras fill the Chamber of Horrors, ready to howl and moan on cue. Quiet on the set. Roll cameras, we're shooting LA Bankruptcy, The Movie.

At 10 a.m. today, the City Council will take up deliberations of a far-reaching plan to downsize and restructure city government in hopes of avoiding the unthinkable, bankruptcy of the nation's second largest city, the once glittering capital of glamour that has fallen on hard times, a victim of the Greenback Plague.

Oh, what a day it will be.
bastille.jpg
The rabble in their rags -- laborers, peasants, cripples, stoners -- will storm the Palace of Opulence that serves as City Hall, so handsomely refurbished with gold and marble adornments for $300 million across the meadow from the $500 million Bastille of Gendarmes.

Minister of Finance Miguel de Santana will tell the 15 princes and princesses on the Council of Blather how dire the situation is. The Treasury is bare. Bankers and creditors are demanding action.

There is no option but to take the bread from the rabble's plate to feed the army of royal servants and fill the coffers of the Lords of Finance.

The Council of Blather, dressed in their finery, will nod their heads in agreement and then nod off to sleep, weary from their life of self-indulgence.

And then the king himself, King Antonio, will slip into the Chamber of Horrors from the back room where he has been cowering in fear for so long and announce they must act today or he will assert his royal prerogative and slash and burn under his own authority.

Nothing for the homeless bums, the blind and disabled, not even crumbs for the multitudes of peasants.

Prince Rosendahl dares to interrupt, demanding the king "explain to me and my district how he can better spend that money than what we're spending it on. We don't waste a penny."

Crown Prince Eric glares coldly at him and says,  with the restraint he is so renowned for, "It's not that those funds are used for bad things. It's that we have people who are about to lose their jobs."

Those people, the royal servants, cheer and clap in support and break into chanting "Feed Us, Feed Us, Feed Us..."

The lower classes mutter and grumble amongst themselves until one fearless soul, hat in hand steps forward and meekly asks for mercy, "Just a crumb, please just a crumb from your table, oh Lords and Masters..."

Tears welling up her eyes, the ambitious Princess Janice, touches the peasant's shoulder with her gloved hand and says she hears his plaint and announces she will give up one of her body servants.

"If we're asking everyone else to sacrifice, we have to also be willing to offer up," she declares.
"Let these humble beings eat cake but only a small piece."

When the king sneaks out the back of the Chamber much as he arrived, the Council engages the arduous labor of agreeing to everything demanded of them.
Thumbnail image for shawn.jpg
But then the unexpected happens, brave young Shawn Simons of Arc rushes forth and demands to be heard. She passionately calls on the Council to retreat from their actions, to see the disaster that will occur, how the whole kingdom could fall into poverty and chaos.

Her pleas fall on deaf ears. She refuses orders to be silent but as the gendarmes move to escort from the Chamber, the masses of nobodies behind her rush forward and a voice in the crowd shouts, "Off with their heads."

At that moment, the director shouts: "Cut, and print."
The City Council takes up CAO Miguel Santana's three-year plan to restructure city government Tuesday to reorganize departments, possibly eliminating Human Services, Neighborhood Empowerment and other agencies.

He sent his list of the 1,000 positions to be eliminated with some of all of the workers transferring to the DWP, Harbor, Airport and special funds. The list of positions was obtained by OurLA.org where it has been posted.
If you want to know all about Janice Hahn's candidacy for Lieutenant Governor of California, there's an easy way to find out where she stands on the issues, volunteer to help and even donate money -- just go to her official LA City Council website.

If that's not an illegal use of city money and facilities, I don't know what is.

Hahn has the nerve -- or perhaps is so used to abuses at City Hall -- that she has a box near the top right of her Council website inviting readers to "SIGN UP NOW for our newsletter" and when you click on it you're asked for your name and email to mark the issues you care about from Airport, to Neighborhood Councils, 12 in all.

hahn2.jpgClick save when you're done with that exercise and you land on the Hahn 2010 campaign page for lieutenant governor.

It's really quite a good site, showing of the San Pedro Councilwoman with her great political pedigree to great effect. It's got all the social media tools and boxes to help you "spread the word," "volunteer" and "donate."

You got to wonder how she gets away with this. Are there no standards, no laws, no appreciation about the difference between public service and self service?

This isn't just a link, which would be bad enough.

It's a phony invitation to find out about city issues from the Councilwoman. It's nothing but a dirty trick to lure you to her campaign site. It ought to be stopped and the abuse punished.



hahn.jpg

It seems like a lifetime ago -- and in dog years it was! - when the San Fernando Valley, tried to secede from Los Angeles. I was reminded why the near divorce almost happened this morning.
Thumbnail image for Thumbnail image for Thumbnail image for Thumbnail image for Thumbnail image for Thumbnail image for Thumbnail image for Thumbnail image for Thumbnail image for Thumbnail image for Thumbnail image for Thumbnail image for Thumbnail image
Take it from me -- I live in the Valley -- it's easy for these people to feel like a second-class citizens. And because I'm a dog, I'm even lower on the kibble chain.

The Daily News' Rick Orlov, who's been covering City Hall since Sam Yorty was mayor and his newspaper was green, reported this morning that because of the budget crisis, Hollywood Eric Garcetti was canceling the once-a-month council meetings in Van Nuys.

The news was delivered to Orlov by Hollywood Eric's flack Julie Wong, who once flacked for San Pedro Jimmy Hahn, the unlucky mayor who got stuck fighting secession before he had time to find the third-floor men's room.

"There are a lot of costs involved in holding a council meeting outside of City Hall," Wong said. "It just seemed like it was a good idea to try to save that money, given the financial situation the city faces."

A lot of costs?

Give this dog a break! Like what?  Each council office has a small fleet of free cars.  Do they all have to pay for parking? The PA system?  Catered food? What about all the other ways they spend money on boondoggles that my pal Walter Moore found?

I don't see why you couldn't do a Council meeting in the Valley once a month for the price of your average PTA meeting.  Janice could bring cookies.

Of course, lots of Valley folks have been barking lately about the performance of Hollywood Eric and the other 14 council members and this just might be seen as rubbing the activists' noses in the pile of crap they left on the living room carpet.

And while that's a punishment Saint Deb would never allow around our house, I don't doubt for a second that the Council would do it to those loudmouths who make their lives so miserable.

Too bad Hollywood Eric didn't call The Dog Whisperer first. Cesar Millan, my favorite TV star, would tell him it just doesn't work.

Cesar might also tell him it's a really dumb move for somebody who's thinking about running for mayor.  And so would San Pedro Jim. Remember him? This dog's memories of him grow fonder by the day.
 
Woof!



Ignore, if you can, Richard Alarcon's arrogant and despicable treatment of an honorable public servant in this video and focus instead on the ignorant and despicable point he is making.

What Alarcon is saying that he wants to take the nearly $8 million in federal stimulus money the city was awarded to buy computers for poor neighborhoods to reduce the digital divide and use it to retain city workers in the current jobs.

In other words, this labor union stooge who talks endlessly about the injustices the rest of us commit against the poor is willing to protect some of the nation's highest paid city workers and cheat kids and families in the city's most impoverished and under-served communities out of the chance for access to the modern world.

For my money, that's a crime against humanity and ought to be recognized as such.

Alarcon is not alone in this skewed view of the world.

For whatever lip service the rest of his colleagues on the City Council may pay to rhyme and reason, they share his sensibility and vote with extraordinary unanimity to put the city's workforce ahead of the city.

That is why we are in trouble, why they are willing to sell the city's assets and mortgage its future, why they are drooling at the chance sock it to us from every direction with higher rates, taxes and fees, why they are for the third time in less than a year back at the bargaining table with the unions begging for help in this budget crisis charade.

They are protecting city jobs, city wages and city benefits at all costs because the unions, with help from developers, contractors and other special interests, put them into the nation's highest and most lavishly perked municipal elected offices.

They no more care about the poor than they care about the rest of us. If they did, poverty in LA would not be getting worse year after year, unemployment would not be among the highest in the country, there would not so much substandard housing, or many sweatshops.

Their programs to help the poor, the disabled, the disadvantaged are as much a failure as virtually every other thing they do from rotting water and electrical systems to 75-year backlogs in sidewalk and street paving, from the proliferation of digital billboards to the proliferation of marijuana shops.

The mayor is no less guilty.
In the first six months after City Hall offered the Early Retirement Incentive Pprgram, 625 workers have actually retired with pensions averaging more than $1,000 a week with 32 of them getting pensions in excess of $100,000 a year, according to records obtained by OurLA.org. under the California Public Records Act.

Read who joined the city's nearly 1,000 members of the Six-Figure Pension Club and the list of the 625 who retired since enhanced pensions were offer to city workers and how much they get monthly at yearly. Go to OurLA.org.Thumbnail image for cityhallpension1.jpg
An old dog who's been involved in LA politics for a long time once told me why our current leaders like Antonio and Fabian Nunez (former leader, now "consultant) tend to flaunt their power with the trappings of success usually associated with millionaires - expensive restaurants, great wine, designer clothes and a wink and a nod when it comes to ethics.
Thumbnail image for Thumbnail image for Thumbnail image for Thumbnail image for Thumbnail image for Thumbnail image for Thumbnail image for Thumbnail image for Thumbnail image for Thumbnail image for Thumbnail image for Thumbnail image for Thumbnail image
They think it's their turn, the old dog said.

I thought about this the other day when I read that Antonio, Fabian and former Ayatollah of the Assembly Willie Brown had dinner recently in one of Beverly Hills (note: not LA!) most expensive restaurants, Cut.  (Great doggie bags, if somebody would like to try to bribe me.)

Willie Brown obviously thought it was his turn, too.

I think the old dog that shared this with me had it right.  Just think about:  If you met any of these guys when they were say 16, what do you think the odds were that they would be being among the most powerful leaders in California?  A million to one?  Maybe.

These guys are scrappers.  They don't have impressive educations.  They operate from their gut.  And because they hang out with lots of rich people who want things from them - remember their power - they tend to believe they should enjoy the same lifestyle.

That's why a lot of people hate them. And I envy them.  Remember, I live on kibble in Ron's backyard.

And I'm scrappy too!

The Dog Trainer's top dog columnist, Steve Lopez, did a dumb online poll last week, asking his readers for the "worst Angeleno of all time."  The winner?  Not Richard "Night Stalker" Ramirez. Not Charles Manson.  But Antonio!

The poll was ridiculous - and Lopez admitted it.  But it says a lot about how people feel about LA right now, at least those who took the time to vote.

They are pissed off.  They want a leader who can fix our problems, not a celebrity - even if it's his turn.

Woof!!

For a moment there, he had me -- I thought the Antonio Villaraigosa I had hoped five years ago would save LA from misrule and mismanagement had awakened from his amnesia and was stepping forward to provide the city with desperately needed leadership at a time of crisis.

Where the City Council on Wednesday had shown itself to be gutless and indecisive, the mayor stood tall at the microphone and announced he was carrying out the drastic budget deficit measures recommended by City Administrative Officer Miguel Santana.

"Mayor Orders 1,000 Layoffs" screamed the headlines on TV, newspapers, websites and emails.

But on further examination, it appears in the fine print (budget-mayor-ltr-100204.pdf) that he is "eliminating" 1,000 jobs from the general fund payroll and moving the workers into other jobs in the DWP, Harbor, Airport or paid for with special funds.

They are phantom layoffs that achieve exactly what the City Council wanted to achieve 30 days from now, what the unions have demanded.

They are savings on paper that do nothing to solve the city's real financial problems caused by the spectacular $11 billion that taxpayers owe to the pension funds.

Once again, the mayor has raised our hopes and then dashed them.

This is exactly the kind sleight of hand that has become the hallmark of City Hall, a political stunt intended to beguile the uninformed and the indifferent and prop up the mayor's standing at a time he couldn't beat Zuma Dogg in a recall election.

For that moment of my delusion, I thought we'd see the mayor address the Council today at its final meeting in Van Nuys -- another abandoned commitment to reach out to the public -- and lay out a plan of action that would restore order to the city's finances and preserve public services.

Instead, we find the mayor is continuing down the road to oblivion for himself and for us.

It's clear he will carry out his plan to gut services, sell off assets and do the bidding of the unions without bringing all the constituencies of the city to the table to figure out a long-term solution that will protect the jobs of  employees, balance the budget and provide the services  needed for a healthy city.

Yet another missed opportunity, a third strike.

Watch how quickly the city's parking structures to the very companies that owe the city more than $100 million in back taxes, the companies that have poured thousands of dollars into city political campaigns even as they were nothing but scofflaws ripping off the public

Watch how quickly AEG takes over the Convention Center, the white elephant that has cost taxpayers hundreds of millions of dollars, to run it as part of their luxury hotel and entertainment complex at LA Live and Staples Center. Digital billboards will quickly be plastered all around the Convention Center to enrich AEG's billionaire owner while the public gets pennies on the dollar.

Watch how the golf courses, Ontario Airport, the zoo and so much else winds up in the hands of insiders and profiteers while the city borrows billions and mortgages our future.

There is no one among our elected officials who will stand in the way of this high-speed train to worsening poverty in a bankrupt city.

They have ignored the warnings of their financial advisers. They have left the documents showing how serious this crisis is unread beyond the cover sheets. They have ignored the will of the people.

And yet, we all hold out hope somehow that common sense will prevail, that something will turn the tide.

We meet and talk and strategize and offer alternatives to inattentive ears. We beg for respect and get nothing but lip service.

If only we the people could transfer our lives to another place as if nothing was wrong...If only we could throw all these nobody politicians into the trash heap of history...If only we could re-create our city into a series of smaller towns that could be managed for the benefit of all with the full participation of all...

Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa broke his silence on the city budget crisis Thursday afternoon and ordered layoffs of 1,000 city employees as soon as possible and the transfer of 360 others to proprietary departments and special-funded positions.

He also opened the door to the immediate retirement of any employee who wishes to do so and urged the City Council to transfer $40 million in uncommitted funds to the rapidly depleting emergency reserve fund.

"We are living beyond our means" the mayor said at a 4 p.m. news conference.

"We  have difficult choices to make. We must protect our economic future. Unfortunately, instead of making progress  we are headed in the wrong direction. That ends today "

Villaraigosa acted one day after the City Council balked at approving layoffs or taking other steps to erase a $208 million budget deficit. In fact, the deficit grew by $4 million even as they debated for eight hours Wednesday over what actions to take and is growing by nearly $400,000 every day.

Invoking his authority under the City Charter, the mayor said:

"I am taking immediate action toward balancing this fiscal year's budget, strengthening the city's credit rating and restoring the city's long-term fiscal health."

He said the layoffs would affect 1,000 filled city positions as recommended by City Administrative Officer Miguel Santana last Friday.

Also, the jobs open at the Harbor, Airport and DWP will be filled by transferring general fund employees to those positions or others paid for with special funds. Employees have until 5 p.m. to request transfers or file for expedited retirement, which could attract workers already at the maximum retirement benefit of 75 percent of final pay.

The transfers will be effective on Feb. 16, leaving little time for the Council to intervene on his action.

"I will reserve my right as mayor to transfer any employee at any time as needed to protect the city's general and reserve funds," the mayor added.

In his press release, the mayor said:

"I do not relish these decisions, but neither will I shy away from them or pretend they don't exist. Angelenos all over our City are making tougher choices between food or their prescription drugs, between school supplies and a doctor's visit for their child, or between their electric bill and their rent. It is time that we at City Hall follow their lead, set priorities, and make the tough choices necessary to protect our core responsibilities."



The stage is set, the actors in place, everyone has rehearsed their lines -- and the curtain is up on the drama that will determine the future of LA.

The masses of workers, neighborhood activists, arts lovers, disabled have joined in a chorus with a plaintive song, beating their chests while the princes and princesses of their realm bluster in a cacophony of discordant brays and hoots until they all come together in unison and sing the overture, "Woe is us."

The shadowy silhouette of the lord of all, King AV, fills the background, breaking his imperious silence from time to time with his lament, "What about me...What about me..."

"Bankruptcy" this Wagnerian opera is called, its opening scene filled with gloom and dread and portents of disasters ahead. Whether it will lead to a new beginning or become the beginning of the end hangs in the balance with the future of LA at stake.

Everyone has offered solutions to the dilemma, all intended to protect what they have, hoping to save themselves from the black plague of bankruptcy.

The unity of the masses dissolves with the Neighborhood Councils singing the aria "We've got a right" with other communities of interest offer the counterpoint "We need your help, don't forget about us." The workers drown them out with the lively old tune, "We've got ideas, so many ideas, 67 ideas to make our troubles go away, go away." (Lyrics provided here
Coalition Worker Ideas.pdf}  

The princes and princesses then take the front of the stage, each singing a different tune. Prince Alarcon, the absentee lord, screams "Soak the rich" while Prince Bernie offers "We gotta be tough," Princess Janice "There's enough for everyone, I love you all" and heir apparent Prince Eric sings his favorite song, "We are all one family, except you and you and you..."

Enter High Priest Miguel, whose calmness is the stuff of saints, his presence bringing stony silence to the assembled players.

"There is an answer to your plaints and prayers," he sings. "I have it here right in my hand. If only you could read, if only you could read between the lines, you'd see the money lenders will save us this day, they will save the day."

I could go on but I wouldn't want to ruin the ending of this great LA drama but I'm not quite sure if it's grand opera or soap opera.

So I leave it to you to write your own ending.

You can see it through a glass darkly, sliding down a slippery slope of phony solutions, reduced basic services, unending conflict and unhappiness, in bankruptcy.

Or you can look on the bright side of things, and see this opening act as nothing more than the start of elaborate negotiations that will lead the cast to simplifying their world by going back to basics and each side giving up something, reductions in salaries/benefits, higher taxes and fees.

Then, everyone would take a seat at the table of power for the grand finale: "We are one, one city, one people, all in this together..."

You decide, it's your drama.

At the moment of truth, the nation's highest paid city officials blinked Wednesday.

They blinked at layoffs. They blinked at eliminating or slashing funding for the disabled, for  the elderly, for Neighborhood Councils, for Environment Affairs, Arts, Culture, for just about everything that was proposed to stave off bankruptcy.

They blinked and squinted in the face of the daunting task of cutting spending, cutting staff, streamlining government.

Watching hour after hour on Wednesday of the City Council confront the truth of what they have wrought was like suddenly being transported to a strange planet where everything works backwards.

Are they crazy? Or is it us for allowing them to get away with creating such a calamity?

The confusion, the ignorance, the vacillation, the nonsense -- it was amazing. Even more incredibly, their efforts over eight hours of budget cutting actually increased the deficit from $208 to $212 million.

They didn't even know they have allowed nearly 60,000 households to pay nothing for trash collection even as they tripled the fee for every other single family home in the city with a broken promise to hire more cops.

They didn't know there's no other community in California that gives more than a 30 percent reduction to the poor. They didn't know their 100 percent subsidy was putting the Sanitation Department $7 million in the red even with the massive increase on everybody else.

They didn't know because it was just one of a thousand irresponsible acts that allowed them to turn City Hall into a political machine that pandered to segments of the population and their concerns while they gave away the city in sweetheart deals to unions, contractors, developers and consultants.

They didn't know and they didn't care because they were big shots with free cars and fancy suits and perks and staff serving their every need.

Well, those days are over and they are scared to death. What are they going to do if they lose these cushy jobs, become lobbyists or maybe parking attendants at the city lots they want to sell to cover a small fraction of the deficit they created?

You couldn't help but have a laugh when they asked bureaucrats to verify the eligibility of the 60,000 subsidized trash fee beneficiaries or found it was illegal to ask contractors to take a 10 percent cut in what they're paid in exchange for preferential treatment on future contracts.

They were near tears when they heard there are only 300 jobs open at the Harbor, Airport and DWP to protect the 1,000 to 1,500 city workers who might be laid off. But that didn't stop them from putting off starting the six-month process for layoffs for at least a month and possibly forever, if the majority gets its way.

And it didn't stop them from urging those proprietary departments to cancel contracts so other city workers' jobs can be saved even if it costs more or adding to the massive unfunded pension liability by adding 500 more workers to the 2,763 already getting sweetened retirement checks.

As the hours dragged by and they got giddy from having to put in a full day of work, it became clearer that there was a certain rationality to what they were doing.

Their political machine was leaking oil, the tires were flat, the body rusted out. They knew that from the Council Chambers packed with hundreds of volunteers and workers and people dependent on critical city services.

They were desperately trying to put the machine back together again to save themselves by assuring all the constituencies they really weren't going to pay for the failure of the city's leadership, that the plan put forward on behalf of the mayor by City Administrative Officer Miguel Santana would never touch them.

All they achieved was the waste of even more time, after months, years of dilly-dallying while the financial problems got worse.

Santana told them with remarkable calmness that the $200 million emergency fund is needed to cover this year's deficit and needs to be replenished with the $100 million from selling parking structures and every other dollar they can scrape together.

It was necessary, he said, and not just in case of natural disasters. Credit agencies have already downgraded the city and will do so again unless they see money in the bank and a long series of credible actions or the cost of borrowing will rise sharply.

And that's the real plan. The city intends to borrow billions to pay its current bills. It's ready to sell off future revenue sources to pay its current bills. Its looted every dollar in special funds to pay its current bills.

And tomorrow? There's no tomorrow, they will all be termed out and living high on their city pensions. It's the rest of us that will have to live with the havoc they are creating..
Lots of news around the dog house today.  First, Kevin Roderick of LAObserved.com, known in LA internet circles as the Westside White Guy, reported that Austin Beutner, the mayor's new jobs czar, has contributed $5,000 to Republican Meg Whitman's campaign for governor.
Thumbnail image for Thumbnail image for Thumbnail image for Thumbnail image for Thumbnail image for Thumbnail image for Thumbnail image for Thumbnail image for Thumbnail image for Thumbnail image for Thumbnail image for Thumbnail image for bruno1watch.jpg
Then, about 10 minutes ago, Bruno was slipped a transcript of a phone call this morning from Jerry Brown to Antonio.  I can't reveal my source, but the pup was recently photographed monkeying around in the mayor's backyard. (We dogs stick together.)

Jerry:  Antonio, hi.   It's Jerry. How you doing?
Antonio:  Jesus, what time is it? Jerry who?
Jerry: Jerry Brown, for chrissakes, the guy you didn't want to run against for governor. It's 10 o'clock, Antonio, wake up.
Antonio:  I guess I shouldn't have had ordered that last $800 bottle of wine last night at Bouchon. But Keith and Ari insisted, and, hey, they were buying.  Those guys love me.
Jerry:  I hate those fancy places.  I read in Willie Brown's column you had an expensive dinner with him and Fabian at some place called Cut.  Jeez, Antonio, the guy hasn't has a hit in years.
Antonio:  That's Fabian Nunez, Jerry.  He was once Assembly Speaker, like Willie and me.
Jerry:  You were Speaker?
Antonio:  What do you want, Jerry.  I need to walk Monkey and get to City Hall.
Jerry:  You have a monkey?
Antonio:  No.  Monkey's my girlfriend's dog.  If I don't walk it, the beast dumps all over the living room floor of my mansion. The servants hate that.
Jerry:  I live in a converted firehouse.  It still has the pole.  Anne loves it.
Antonio:  I'm sure.  Now what are you calling about?
Jerry:  This guy Beutner.
Antonio: 
Who?
Jerry:  Austin Beutner.  Your new jobs czar.
Antonio:  Oh, yeah.  Now I remember.  Riordan and Broad came up with him.  Big time financial guy until he fell off his bike or something.  I got him for a dollar a year.  What's the problem?
Jerry:  He gave five thousand dollars to Meg.
Antonio: Who?
Jerry:  Meg Whitman, my likely Republican opponent.  Ran EBay.
Antonio:  She was on Bay Watch?
Jerry:  No, Antonio, EBay, the internet company where people buy and sell stuff.
Antonio: Never heard of it. Sounds like City Hall to me.
Jerry:  Never mind.  What the hell is he doing contributing to my Republican opponent?
Antonio: I don't know.  Maybe Riordan told him to do it.  He rides bicycles, too (Dog barks in background) Would somebody shut the f...ing dog up!!  I'm on the phone with the next governor of California.
Jerry:  Oh, yeah.  Thanks a lot for not running.  Saves me a lot of aggravation.
Antonio:  Like I had a choice after the damn girlfriend thing.  I don't understand why those reporters didn't believe I stopped wearing my wedding ring because I lost weight.
Jerry:  The press sucks.
Antonio:  Tell me about it.
Jerry:  Well, I gotta go.  Do me a favor and talk to Beutner. He's on your payroll.
Antonio:  OK. I'm sure somebody around here has his number.  Take it easy. And if you change your mind about running ......
Jerry:  I won't.  Bye.
Antonio:  Ciao.

Bruno says woof! woof!



hollywoodhighland.jpgCity Hall's plan to privatize 10 parking structures to cover its $208 million deficit without having to go into bankruptcy hit a snag Tuesday -- the biggest tax scofflaws in the city are parking lot operators.

For years, city officials did little or nothing to collect the $400 million owed it by companies and individuals -- topping the list of debtors are parking lot operators who owe the city more than $100 million.

In an emotional and sometimes angry Council session Tuesday, the issue came up as an embarrassment and obstacle to turning over operation of the city's lots to the same group of people who have ripped the city off.

Nonetheless, the Council unanimously approved spending more than $500,000 more for a total of $1.2 million to move forward with studies to privatize its parking structures.

For a full report, got to OurLA.org and read stories headliined Parking Lot Privatization Triggers Heated Council Debate and Looking For Funds in LA Parking Structures,
Tax Scofflaws.  Lists of top debtors headed by parking lot operators are also available.
.
We came as beggars and peasants pleading with the lords of the manor for mercy and they dispensed meager favors according to their whims.
Thumbnail image for prayla.jpg
Hundreds of people with disabilities, the deaf and wheelchair-bound, Neighborhood Council volunteers, environmentalists, lovers of art and culture, all hoping somehow to protect what they have.

It was as if this was a medieval time and the black plague was ravaging our world, or in this case a plague of red ink caused by the failure of those masters of fiefdoms to tend to their flock.

It went on for 12 hours and harsh decisions were made, however tentatively, long after the beggars and peasants had gone back to their huts to pray some more.

In the end, it was clear enough that only a miracle could prevent the death of our city.

They called for reducing the Police and Fire departments, slashed funding for NCs in half to $22,500 while gutting their support staff, shied away from eliminating what little help they have given the disabled even as they proposed taking away from them and the elderly the 100 percent subsidy 58,393 of them get in subsidized trash collection.

As much as they hemmed and hawed, quibbled and wrung their hands, City Administrative Officer Miguel Santana relentlessly pursued his agenda of laying off 1,000 city workers, transferring 500 others into protected jobs, selling off assets like parking structures and downsizing every part of city government except, of course, the DWP, Harbor and Airport -- the designated cash cows.

Even if all the dozens of cuts and finagles are actually executed, they still won't be enough to do more than get the city through until July when even more layoffs and cuts will be needed since the $208 million deficit we have seven months into the fiscal year will balloon to $485 million and keep on soaring for years to come, five years, maybe 10, said Santana.

The Red Plague that has visited us was years in the making, Santana said, years of bad policies and poor management and sweetheart deals and giveaways to the rich and influential. He put it more gently than that but there was no mistaking his meaning.

The breakdown in our city government is so great that we can only do everything we can and hope and pray for a miracle.

So let us pray together -- or better come together and change the conversation from one of death by a thousand cuts to one that ends this charade and overthrows these lords, resurrects the city and gives birth to a new spirit of LA.
I spent all my life struggling to put into words what I believe, what I feel, the truth as I see it. I thought somehow that is what it meant to be an American.

I wrote and edited tens of thousands of stories but it's only been in the last two years working for love and not money that I began to find my voice as me.

On Monday, I came close during my two minutes in front of the Council Budget Committee and later during a two-minute segment on the NBC news show "The Filter with Fred Roggin" (re-broadcast Tuesday at 11:30 a.m.).

You can believe anything you want but this is what I believe.






A pop quiz:  Which job is safer? A member of a Marine bomb squad in Iraq and Afghanistan ("The Hurt Locker" is Bruno's Oscar pick for best picture, by the way), or general manager of LA's Department of Animal Services?
Thumbnail image for Thumbnail image for Thumbnail image for Thumbnail image for Thumbnail image for Thumbnail image for Thumbnail image for Thumbnail image for Thumbnail image for Thumbnail image for Thumbnail image for Thumbnail image for Thumbnail image
Watching the movie can be nerve rattling.  Watching someone try to run Animal Services can be quite entertaining.

Talk about a no-win job.  But if you're interested, it's open and the only specified qualification is having a driver's licensei' although I'd say a permit to carry a concealed weapon is also essential

"Francis of Assisi would have trouble in this town," Bill Dyer, a veteran animal welfare advocate told the Dog Trainer (this is too easy), invoking the patron saint of animals (he's my favorite) more than once when speaking of the general manager's job.

As a one-time homeless dog, I don't pretend to be objective on this subject.  Well, OK, I don't pretend to be objective on any subject.  But this one involves what's called a "no-kill" policy!
Grrrrrr!

The Dog Trainer says "the successful candidate must be compassionate but business-minded, able to inspire the army of staffers who care for the city's abandoned animals and lost pets; to survive interrogation by the L.A. City Council; and to appease the legions of devoted volunteers, rescuers and advocates in the city's humane community."

Add masochistic to the list.

The last guy, who quit last June, was raked over the coals by just about everybody and nearly lynched by his employees.  The GM before him - who lasted just 13 months - had the lobby of his building smoke-bombed by animal activists.

Wondering where to apply yet?  Here's what the Trainer says you'll face:

"The city hired a search firm, sent an e-mail survey to 450 so-called stakeholders in the animal welfare system and set up a focus group. In what one source called 'a brainstorming session,' the mayor met with a small group of animal welfare experts -- including 'dog whisperer' Cesar Millan and Francis Battista, one of the founders of Best Friends Animal Society, a national animal-protection nonprofit that runs its own sanctuary."

Cesar? That's my favorite show, after "American Idol"

Antonio makes the final decision, of course.  And I'll bet you a steak bone that his current girlfriend, beauty queen turned TV reporter Lu Parker, might get involved.  After all, her pooch, the adorable Monkey, was recently photographed romping in the mayor's backyard.

I guess I don't have to tell you how I feel about "no kill."  After all, if Ron's wife, Saint Deborah, didn't take me in after finding me in their shrubs, I probably would have ended in my own version of "Dead Dog Walking." Given my appearance, I doubt anybody not in a street gang would have considered making me the family pet.

But for this to work - and for the next GM to last more than a year with his life - it's essential you guys help dogs like me practice birth control.  And don't count my kind to practice any of your tricky human maneuvers.  "Don't worry, honey, I'll know when ... "

Get us fixed now!  It's cheap or free and, take it from me, it only hurts for a minute or two.
If for no other reason, do it for the mayor.  He's got his hands full with the city's financial crisis.

Thought I was going to make a smart-ass remark about his sex life, didn't you?
 
Woof!
EDITOR"S NOTE: Union leaders are angry and many of their members are angry at them. Community leaders on Neighborhood Councils are ready to go to war over the loss of their funding. And so are hundreds of other people who participate in city affairs and see the damage that the Mayor and City Council will cause with their panicked budget-slashing plan.

Christopher Robleto is one of those people who has given his time and energy to solve some of the city's problems with the help of the small amount of money provided to the Los Angeles Youth Council. Here is his story:


By Christopher Robleto
Chapter Coordinator, Northeast Division, Los Angeles Youth Council.

In the midst of budget deficits last year, the City Council voted and Mayor Villaraigosa approved the consolidation of the following in order to form the new Human Services Department (HSD).
• Commission for Children, Youth, and Their Families
• Commission on the Status of Women
• Human Relations Commission

And yet, not even a whole year later, the department is up on the chopping block and facing possible elimination, with a decision to be made as early as this month.

The HSD only operates on $2.1 million per year which represents 0.1% of the city's budget. This is a small cost to pay when considering what the department does for the City of Los Angeles on a budget that has already been slashed significantly.

Some things that the HSD does includes:
• Proactively addressing tensions in the community and task forces before they erupt
• Mitigating factors that cause poverty and disenfranchisement
• Empowering youths to make a difference in their communities by housing the Los Angeles Youth Council
• Engaging youths in the civic process and linking them to opportunities and resources
• Promoting awareness of the problems that women in the City of Los Angeles face
• Actively addressing the issue of children and school safety by training parents for the KidWatch Safety Valet Program
• Serving as the eyes and ears for city policymakers on various issues including: Juvenile justice, LGBT concerns, education, homelessness, housing, immigration, interfaith activities, LAPD and LAFD Instruction and Curriculum Development, and more!

WE NEED YOUR HELP to tell City Council and the Mayor that cutting the Human Services Department is not a great idea. The department is an investment that will pay its dividends on the back end. We gain from having this department in the long run.

Where's Ron?


Catch Ron on the Kevin James Show on KRLA 870 at 9:30 p.m. this Wednesday night and as a regular commentator on Monday nights NBC's innovative news show "The Filter with Fred Roggin." "The Filter" is broadcast on NBC's Raw Channel 225 at 7:30 p.m. Monday-Thursday with re-broadcasts of the previous night's show starting at 11:30 a.m. Tuesday-Friday on Channel 4. Here's links to latest chats with Kevin James http://tinyurl.com/ybh5fu6   and http://tinyurl.com/yfno96b and http://tinyurl.com/y9fgdm5 and the last two "The Filter" shows where Ron appeared with actress and regular commentator Debra Skelton: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AXZwzrtlF1E and http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wCoGofOr07o and http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kr4NllJ67cM and http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=otUJ3HQWj0w Here's the recent interview on Off The Presses with Brendan Huffman, Damian Jones and Edward Headington http://www.latalkradio.com/Presses.php

"HELP SAVE LA"

The Saving LA Project will hold meet this Saturday, Jan. 23, at 10:30 a.m. at the Hollywood Community Center, 6501 Franklin Ave., Hollywood. Organizing SLAP for action, the budget crisis, DWP policies, planning issues, LAUSD are on the agenda. Everyone welcome, sandwiches, easy parking. Don't be a bystander. Get involved and help save LA.

OurLA.org - The News Revolution

What's happening in LA? Go to www.OurLA.org. Participate in the reinvention of journalism online. Share what you know and what you believe. Send your articles, photos, videos to info@ourla.org. OurLA.org -- a community-based online newspaper for the 21st century. Our LA is a non-profit that belongs to the community and depends on your efforts as citizen journalists and concerned citizens. Learn from others as we bring together the content of local websites and bloggers, professional journalists and experts into a single comprehensive LA news site. Register at www.OurLA.org to be be full participant. Email me if you want to volunteer or have questions and to let me know about local content websites you find useful and informative. You can make a tax-deductible contribution by sending a check to Community Partners for the benefit of OurLA.org to Community Partners, 1000 N. Alameda St. Suite 240, Los Angeles 90012 or by credit card at the Community Partner's website.

About Ron

Ron Kaye

is the former editor of the Los Angeles Daily News who has become a community activist, helping to found the Saving LA Project. He writes on city issues in Los Angeles and is a frequent speaker at community groups on the need to get informed and involved in the effort to make LA a city of great schools and neighborhoods, a city with a healthy business climate and good jobs, a city where the people are respected and have a seat at the table of power.

Email Ron at ron@ronkayela.com

Links

About this Archive

This page is an archive of entries from February 2010 listed from newest to oldest.

January 2010 is the previous archive.

March 2010 is the next archive.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.