Comment on this post

Council Cowards Cower in Face of D’Arcy’s Bullying on DWP Rate Payer Advocate

Eric Garcetti showed his true color Tuesday — yellow, the color of the coward.

After months of effort by concerned citizens and three months of Council public hearings, the man who would be mayor cut a  last-minute deal with IBEW union bully Brian D’Arcy to gut the proposed Charter amendment to create a Rate Payer Advocate to protect the public from the DWP, its long-term mismanagement and outrageous.Video 15 0 01 11-21.jpgrate hikes.

“Gutted” is the word Greig Smith used for it, Tony Cardenas called it a deliberate attempt to make the Rate Payer Advocate’s role “ambiguous.”

It took all Garcetti’s leverage as Council President to twist the arms of his weakest colleagues to win an-8-7 vote to pass a Charter amendment proposal for the March 8 ballot that is all but meaningless.

Remember who knuckled under: The indicted fefon RIchard Alarcon; Jose Huizar, Tom LaBonge and Herb Wesson, all frightened to death the IBEW will spend heavily to defeat in their re-election bids; the irrelevant Janice Hahn and Ed Reyes, and the duplicitous Dennis Zine.

Those with half a brain and an ounce of courage and integrity stood behind the specific and clear language worked out in a long public process and was drafted by the City Attorney’s Office last week and sent to the Council on Friday.

But well into the meeting with an IBEW lobbyist lurking in the background, Garcetti pulled key paragraphs from the proposal, describing in detail the broad authority and power of what has become the Office of Public Accountability (OPA) and deleting any mention of the Rate Payer Advocate.

“The role of the OPA shall be to (1) promote efficiency and effectiveness of the department; (2) provide a centralized focus on ratepayer protection and consumer complaints; and (3) provide independent analysis of department actions, particularly as they relate to water and electricity rate actions. The OPA shall advocate against
excessive rates and shall provide expert advice on rate actions and strategies which most economically accomplish the City’s policy goals and protect the department’s long-term interests,” the draft said.

When Garcetti was done, the OPA will keep an eye of some sort on water and power rates and have vague authority as to even what information it can obtain.

What the OPA really will do and how the office is structured and the executive director is chosen will be decided later by the City Council — if the public is gullible enough to vote for this sham.

You can trust people like Garcetti and his colleagues do the right thing,. can’t you? After all, they have done such a great job of looking after the public’s money and paving the street and sidewalks and protecting our neighborhoods, haven’t they?

You better be able to trust these people who have for so long betrayed the public trust because just about every one of the nearly one dozen ballot measures they approved Tuesday leaves what voters approve up to the Council to decide what it really means — after the public votes in March.

Take the requirement that they maintain a healthy emergency reserve fund in case of a riot or earthquake. The ballot measure is so full of loopholes, the Council can raid the reserve any time it wants just by getting 10 votes together and declaring a fiscal emergency like the one invoked to raid the reserve fund the last two years.

Then, there’ s the hollow measure to lift the cap on public financing of campaigns and put $3 million in it every year. It doesn’t do anything to provide more money to challengers to the incumbents so heavily financed by special interests and the Council can take the money back any time it wants.

That measure is lumped together with one banning contractors with the city from contributing to political campaigns but it doesn’t effect developers who supply most of the dirty money and does nothing to stop contractors, unions or anyone else from  spending as much as they want through independent expenditure committees.

You can go through the whole list and I’m sure there is anything of consequence that anyone who cares about the city’s future should bother to support.

From what I saw watching them make a mockery of good government for more than five hours, it won’t make a difference whether we pass or reject these measures.

They do nothing to fix the budget crisis, the pension crisis, the disaster that has become the DWP or anything else.

Surely, the symbol of this phony reform ballot is the tax they approved on sales of marijuana — sales that are illegal under state law and possession of which is a federal crime.

Enhanced by Zemanta
This entry was posted in City Hall, Community Activists, DWP, Hot Topics, Los Angeles and tagged , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

8 Responses to Council Cowards Cower in Face of D’Arcy’s Bullying on DWP Rate Payer Advocate

  1. Anonymous says:

    In other words, business as usual. This house of cards will fall.

  2. I did some research.
    Zine as Controller would be an automatic violation of GAAP, much the same as Wendy.

  3. Anonymous says:

    Zine showed his true colors in April 2010 when he voted to agree with Garcetti’s phony findings to hear “Special 1″ to raise DWP rates. He then voted no, but ignored the opinion of the City Attorney who in rare form stated that he didn’t think Garcetti was right in his findings for a Special.

  4. Anonymous says:

    BASTARDS!!!! All of them. Its about time eveyone gets up off their ASSES and start to get pissed and speak out. Every meeting you attend speak out about the Corruption and underhanded dealings going on in city council. Bimbo and imbecile Janice Hahn pushed to get marijuana tax on the ballot and now we know why they are endangering PUBLIC SAFETY to make money. There have been many homicides and robberies at the pot shops but these assholes could careless. We need to start wearing T-Shirts to send out the message No Incumbents” WHoever knows on to put them online would make a fortune. A great way to fundraise. Someone please do it and I will buy them.

  5. Anonymous says:

    Eric Garcetti has always been the spoiler on the City Clowncil. If you want more inside deals with unions, developers and special interests then your going to give him your vote for mayor. The DWP ratepayers of Los Angeles will continue to get abused by the mayor, clowncil, and city unions until all incumbents are voted out. This means permanently put out to pasture and not another office like Dennis (hypocrite) Zine wants to be controller. We do not want liars, thieves, hypocrites and cowards running our city.

  6. Anonymous says:

    November 17, 2010 5:51 AM
    Remember when LOST Angeles Need to Set Precedent Eric Garcetti hid the PA Consulting report from the PUBLIC regarding the “extremely risky” Measure B that Angelenos defeated on March 3, 2009. Since Garcetti has demonstrated transparency he should be the next mayor.
    Los Angeles Times
    Council gets “Secret” solar report
    One day after The Times revealed that Los Angeles officials had secretly received a report warning that a solar power plan on the March 3 ballot was “extremely risky,” the official who secured the analysis delivered it to the City Council.
    In envelopes stamped “confidential,” Chief Legislative Analyst Gerry Miller, the council’s top policy advisor, distributed a copy of a Nov. 4 memo he wrote to Council President Eric Garcetti listing 13 warnings about the solar plan.
    Nine council members said Friday that they did not receive the Nov. 4 analysis before they agreed to put the solar measure on the ballot. The analysis, issued three days before the vote, warned that the Department of Water and Power had underestimated the cost of the program, lacked the ability to carry it out and could saddle ratepayers with higher electricity bills.
    Thank you LA Times!
    http://articles.latimes.com/2008/dec/20/local/me-solar20

  7. Anonymous says:

    Thank God for Krekorian.

  8. Nice read, I just passed this onto a colleague who was doing some research on that. And he just bought me lunch since I found it for him smile So let me rephrase that: Thank you for lunch! Goldstar Locksmith 9620 w russell rd #2134 las vegas NV 89148 United States 702-475-6825.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Council Cowards Cower in Face of D’Arcy’s Bullying on DWP Rate Payer Advocate

Eric Garcetti showed his true color Tuesday — yellow, the color of the coward.

After months of effort by concerned citizens and three months of Council public hearings, the man who would be mayor cut a  last-minute deal with IBEW union bully Brian D’Arcy to gut the proposed Charter amendment to create a Rate Payer Advocate to protect the public from the DWP, its long-term mismanagement and outrageous.Video 15 0 01 11-21.jpgrate hikes.

“Gutted” is the word Greig Smith used for it, Tony Cardenas called it a deliberate attempt to make the Rate Payer Advocate’s role “ambiguous.”

It took all Garcetti’s leverage as Council President to twist the arms of his weakest colleagues to win an-8-7 vote to pass a Charter amendment proposal for the March 8 ballot that is all but meaningless.

Remember who knuckled under: The indicted fefon RIchard Alarcon; Jose Huizar, Tom LaBonge and Herb Wesson, all frightened to death the IBEW will spend heavily to defeat in their re-election bids; the irrelevant Janice Hahn and Ed Reyes, and the duplicitous Dennis Zine.

Those with half a brain and an ounce of courage and integrity stood behind the specific and clear language worked out in a long public process and was drafted by the City Attorney’s Office last week and sent to the Council on Friday.

But well into the meeting with an IBEW lobbyist lurking in the background, Garcetti pulled key paragraphs from the proposal, describing in detail the broad authority and power of what has become the Office of Public Accountability (OPA) and deleting any mention of the Rate Payer Advocate.

“The role of the OPA shall be to (1) promote efficiency and effectiveness of the department; (2) provide a centralized focus on ratepayer protection and consumer complaints; and (3) provide independent analysis of department actions, particularly as they relate to water and electricity rate actions. The OPA shall advocate against
excessive rates and shall provide expert advice on rate actions and strategies which most economically accomplish the City’s policy goals and protect the department’s long-term interests,” the draft said.

When Garcetti was done, the OPA will keep an eye of some sort on water and power rates and have vague authority as to even what information it can obtain.

What the OPA really will do and how the office is structured and the executive director is chosen will be decided later by the City Council — if the public is gullible enough to vote for this sham.

You can trust people like Garcetti and his colleagues do the right thing,. can’t you? After all, they have done such a great job of looking after the public’s money and paving the street and sidewalks and protecting our neighborhoods, haven’t they?

You better be able to trust these people who have for so long betrayed the public trust because just about every one of the nearly one dozen ballot measures they approved Tuesday leaves what voters approve up to the Council to decide what it really means — after the public votes in March.

Take the requirement that they maintain a healthy emergency reserve fund in case of a riot or earthquake. The ballot measure is so full of loopholes, the Council can raid the reserve any time it wants just by getting 10 votes together and declaring a fiscal emergency like the one invoked to raid the reserve fund the last two years.

Then, there’ s the hollow measure to lift the cap on public financing of campaigns and put $3 million in it every year. It doesn’t do anything to provide more money to challengers to the incumbents so heavily financed by special interests and the Council can take the money back any time it wants.

That measure is lumped together with one banning contractors with the city from contributing to political campaigns but it doesn’t effect developers who supply most of the dirty money and does nothing to stop contractors, unions or anyone else from  spending as much as they want through independent expenditure committees.

You can go through the whole list and I’m sure there is anything of consequence that anyone who cares about the city’s future should bother to support.

From what I saw watching them make a mockery of good government for more than five hours, it won’t make a difference whether we pass or reject these measures.

They do nothing to fix the budget crisis, the pension crisis, the disaster that has become the DWP or anything else.

Surely, the symbol of this phony reform ballot is the tax they approved on sales of marijuana — sales that are illegal under state law and possession of which is a federal crime.

Enhanced by Zemanta
This entry was posted in City Hall, Community Activists, DWP, Hot Topics, Los Angeles and tagged , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

14 Responses to Council Cowards Cower in Face of D’Arcy’s Bullying on DWP Rate Payer Advocate

  1. Anonymous says:

    Pattiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii! What do you have to say for your sweet boy, pretty face Eric? Waiting anxiously to hear your views. You have been chimimg in after all, when the yellow Garcetti`s name is mentioned.

  2. Anonymous says:

    Let`s see if the thug can save Huizar and LaBonge. As far as the future Controller Zine, he is for a big surprise. He can go back on motorcycle duty chasing skirts.

  3. Anonymous says:

    I wondered how much has been or will be contributed to felon Alarcon`s legal defense fund by D`Arcy controlled groups.

  4. Walter Moore says:

    If any of the Clowncil Members want to show some leadership, he or she should simply start doing what a rate-payer advocate would do. Issue some subpoenas; hold some hearings; review some documents.
    Better yet, the City’s chief executive officer could actually start doing his job. You know, the Mayor?
    None of that’s going to happen, of course. So now the ball’s in the public’s court. Are you going to re-elect the incumbents in the even-numbered districts in March, or throw them out?

  5. Anonymous says:

    Zine looked really worried behind that scruffy beard of his – it’s like he and Garcetti are both hiding behind theirs. The perpetual smug look was off his face, his two-faced jig is up, he’s been found out not only by the liberals and he knows it.
    Now that Cooley looks to lose, his coattails won’t help him and he’s panicked about his prospects for Controller. Lord knows he alienated the mayor enough, badmouthed him enough including on rightwing radio, to have no going back. Even though the mayor seems to have ignored it and invited him along in photo ops – bizarrely, even when they came to our little library in the valley. While Antonio was talking and Weiss was standing there to be introduced, Zine was making faces behind their backs like a child! If he hated them, fine, but don’t show up and stab them in the back! You don’t make hostile comments all over the media and then show up and mug for the cameras with them! Have some backbone one way or the other.
    So what does he do now?
    Gets in deeper by voting with the majority for D’Arcy. Figures that’s his only chance now. But he’ll never win the unions over Garcetti or the Democrats, and he’s lost the teabaggers.
    All the rats are scurrying looking for safe haven and there aren’t many to be had for any of them.

  6. I did some research.
    Zine as Controller would be an automatic violation of GAAP, much the same as Wendy.

  7. Anonymous says:

    Zine showed his true colors in April 2010 when he voted to agree with Garcetti’s phony findings to hear “Special 1″ to raise DWP rates. He then voted no, but ignored the opinion of the City Attorney who in rare form stated that he didn’t think Garcetti was right in his findings for a Special.

  8. Anonymous says:

    The individuals who voted for these L.A. politicians are the same people who complain the most. The solution is simple! STOP complaining and vote against these lack of leadership politicians into city, county, or state offices on March 8, 2011.
    Don’t be fooled again by wolves dressed in sheep clothing.

  9. Patricia says:

    I for one are not one of those complaining. I am happy with Council President Eric Garcetti because he is out there in the community working tirelessly to make the City work better.
    The Rate Payer’s advocate is one example. Eric took it to the people and followed their wishes to put this on the ballot.

  10. Sandy Sand says:

    The power of the blog!
    The first comment to the Daily News story
    http://www.dailynews.com/politics/ci_16632561
    about this refers right back to a link for this post.

  11. Anonymous says:

    WE beat them on Measure B the BS solar energy bill and we can beat them again. Let’s all persevere in getting rid of all of them. We are responsible in our respective districts to tell everyone what they have done and that’s NOT represent the people. Again, they are wasting tax payer money when they didn’t need a ballot measure, they could have done this themselves. Let’s see who IBEW donates money to and that’s a good story to vote them OUT

  12. Anonymous says:

    Everyone in LA needs to know that Garcetti is a crook and should never be elected for another position.

  13. Anonymous says:

    November 17, 2010 5:51 AM
    Remember when LOST Angeles Need to Set Precedent Eric Garcetti hid the PA Consulting report from the PUBLIC regarding the “extremely risky” Measure B that Angelenos defeated on March 3, 2009. Since Garcetti has demonstrated transparency he should be the next mayor.
    Los Angeles Times
    Council gets “Secret” solar report
    One day after The Times revealed that Los Angeles officials had secretly received a report warning that a solar power plan on the March 3 ballot was “extremely risky,” the official who secured the analysis delivered it to the City Council.
    In envelopes stamped “confidential,” Chief Legislative Analyst Gerry Miller, the council’s top policy advisor, distributed a copy of a Nov. 4 memo he wrote to Council President Eric Garcetti listing 13 warnings about the solar plan.
    Nine council members said Friday that they did not receive the Nov. 4 analysis before they agreed to put the solar measure on the ballot. The analysis, issued three days before the vote, warned that the Department of Water and Power had underestimated the cost of the program, lacked the ability to carry it out and could saddle ratepayers with higher electricity bills.
    Thank you LA Times!
    http://articles.latimes.com/2008/dec/20/local/me-solar20

  14. Nice read, I just passed this onto a colleague who was doing some research on that. And he just bought me lunch since I found it for him smile So let me rephrase that: Thank you for lunch! Goldstar Locksmith 9620 w russell rd #2134 las vegas NV 89148 United States 702-475-6825.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>