Rudy Martinez Interview on KTLA on Jose Huizar Consultant’s Infamous Email Threat

4 Responses to Rudy Martinez Interview on KTLA on Jose Huizar Consultant’s Infamous Email Threat

1. Anonymous says:

   February 7, 2011 at 3:07 pm

   Word to Huizar supporters from his campaign is instead of taking the high road and start focusing and telling consittuents why Huizar should be re elected, Huizar is going to focus on the negative the rest of the weeks continuing to slam his opponent. After this email story hit the internet constituents are jumping on board Mr. Martinez camp. They’re tired of being afraid to speak out and figure if they don’t do it now they will be stuck with the same gangster low life mentality Huizar and his team have against community members.

   Reply
2. Anonymous says:

   February 7, 2011 at 3:08 pm

   I don’t know Huizar and think he has wasted a lot of money on his El Gritos and so on, with his face on everything, his parades and vanity spectacles. Don’t know much else.
   But it’s a disgrace that the Times’ endorsement of Martinez wrote off his battery and DUI charges, a total of 4 “youthful indiscretions,” as nothing – while making mountains out of every Huizar molehill. The Times calls Martinez’s flipping houses some noble calling, and trumps up some major community involvement that doesn’t exist – at least, not before the photo ops for the campaign. Almost as bad as the lies and distortions that put out for Carmen the Clown, and look how that turned out for the city.
   Now here’s someone who seems like an opportunist with a shady past, and the Times even makes his poor education vs. Huizar’s out to be a plus. Since when is being undeducated in and of itsef a good thing? Again, look at the nightschool law school blowhard, and his lack of undertanding his job or the niceties of the law, the havoc that wreaks in the city attorney’s office by many first-hand accounts. And it’s not like Huizar was born with a silver spoon in his mouth – in itself no crime, if someone with means wants to go into public service instead of lining his pockets – he’s a first-generation immigrant. He gets criticized for that, for being too Mexican, then for being too Princeton.
   Then predictably, as is their pattern, after their endorsement or “annointing,” the “news” side comes out with hit piece after hit piece (though it started before the endorsement, so we knew what was coming), mostly written by their attack dog, David Zahniser.
   This piling on is a huge disservice to the voters – and it makes a sham out of the alleged wall between editorial and “news.” Their “news” is really just a backup for their editorial, and whoever it is behind the curtain pulling all the strings. A sad excuse for a major paper.
   It’s a foregone conclusion that the Times will keep coming out with nastier and nastier hits on Huizar if he continues to pose a strong challenge or be the likely winner. Disgraceful.

   Reply
3. Anonymous says:

   February 7, 2011 at 3:44 pm

   3:08, over the past year and a half, you’ve condemned Trutanich’s lack of Harvard or some other ivy league school education as a reason he should not be CA. Did he not pass his bar exam unlike our dumb Mayor who failed half a dozen times. Either you are just plain ignorant about what it takes to be a CA, or you are a person with your own personal agenda that simply does not jive with most people looking for honest electeds. You have your own dumb blog, so spare us your nonsense. Do your propaganda on your own blog.

   Reply
4. Walter Moore says:

   February 7, 2011 at 11:52 pm

   So Huizar didn’t even have the guts to do on camera?
   Wussy!

   Reply