The The state’s high court indicated on
California Supreme Court will rule Thursday on the legality of the
state’s move to grab $1.7 billion in redevelopment money to help close
California’s budget shortfall, according to the San Jose Mercury-News.
its website Wednesday that it would rule by 10 a.m. Thursday on the
legal conflict. The Supreme Court previously had agreed to rule on the
crucial issue by Jan. 15, when half of the redevelopment money is slated
to be turned over to the state for the 2011-12 fiscal year….
Ron Kaye L.A.Email: ron@ronkayela.com

-
Recent Posts
- Zine Slip-Slides Away with Double-Dipping Pensions as Council Readies to Nuke Hollywood with Millennium Project
- My Sunday Column: Water (wars) provide a lesson in government — and the reason why cynicism has won
- Why Government Robs You Blind: Because It Can — They Make and Enforce the Laws and Frighten You into Submission
- My Sunday Column: Giving into IBEW Blackmail or Fighting It — With Rates Soaring, the Moment of Truth Is Near
- The Antonio to Eric Handoff: LA’s Quality of Life Disaster — Deregulating Planning, Zoning and Building Code Enforcement
Recent Comments
- Anonymous on Zine Slip-Slides Away with Double-Dipping Pensions as Council Readies to Nuke Hollywood with Millennium Project
- ex valley on My Sunday Column: Water (wars) provide a lesson in government — and the reason why cynicism has won
- Rita-of-Sunland on My Sunday Column: Water (wars) provide a lesson in government — and the reason why cynicism has won
- City Council Man Elect Robert "2 Job Bob" Blumenfeld on My Sunday Column: Water (wars) provide a lesson in government — and the reason why cynicism has won
- Wayne from Encino re: Garstupid's Chief of Staff on Why Government Robs You Blind: Because It Can — They Make and Enforce the Laws and Frighten You into Submission
Archives
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
Categories
- 2012 Election
- 2013 Election
- 2013 LA Elections
- Bastille Day videos
- Bruno Watchdog L.A.
- City Hall
- Community Activists
- Development/CRA
- DWP
- Gangs
- Glendale-Burbank
- Hot Topics
- LA Clean Sweep
- LA County
- LAFD
- LAUSD
- Los Angeles
- Naked City
- NFL Stadium
- OccupyLA
- Pensions
- Solar Energy
- The Valley
- Transportation
- Uncategorized
- Whodunit
Meta
- The administrator needs to log in and select a Google Analytics account.
Advertise with Ron Kaye L.A.




This decision should be vital for Los Angeles’ solvency. If the CRA continues in any form including as a VARP, L.A. will go bankrupt, but first it will try to abolish Prop 13 and raise the property taxes sky high on small businesses and homeowners.
The CRA won’t raise the taxes on its own mega-developers and if the assessor raises those taxes, the CRA will turn argound and give the loot back to the developers.
Bury CRA with a stake in its heart.
According to persons who attended the oral argument, the Supreme Court leaned more toward upholding the Legislature’s abolishment of CRAs and invalidating the son of CRA law. That would be the worst scenario for CRAs. They would be dead.
Ding dong. Ding dong.