Comment on this post

The ‘pothole’ theory of solving a city’s problems — My Sunday Column

On the day the redevelopment money machine died, the opening scene of “Saving Private Ryan” came to the mind of Glendale’s new city manager, Scott Ochoa. It was the scene where medics are frantically trying to stop the bleeding of a soldier wounded in the D-Day landing and when they do, a bullet hits the solder in the head.

“That’s sort of how I feel today,” Ochoa said, reflecting on the chaotic
situation cities across the state are facing with the termination Feb. 1 of all 400 redevelopment agencies by the governor and Legislature. 

“As of today, we don’t exist as a redevelopment agency. They left us no Plan B. The whole situation is starting to collapse. It will be problematic for quite a while and then they will come back with a big rebranded effort for a new agency with tax increment financing for affordable housing, economic development, creating jobs, eliminating blight. It will look a lot like what we just lost.”

The moment of indignation breaks and he laughs: “Their job is politics. Mine is running a city.”

Ochoa talks about the resilience and ingenuity of cities to solve their
problems no matter what the state does and how he operates in a job where the work week ends Sunday morning and the new week begins Sunday afternoon mainly because the No. 1 task is to make sure council members “have the information they need and are prepared so they don’t make bad choices.”

Sometimes, he sounds like a scientist revealing his technique for taking apart a microbe, identifying all of its pieces and analyzing how all the elements fit together.

“The mantra that I live by, and our folks will too, is AMD-OEM:
Adapt-Migrate-or Die/Operate-Evaluate-Modulate. The future is coming and you can deal with it or put your head in the sand, but at the end of the day, we still have to fill those potholes. Understanding what’s coming our way, trying to anticipate the wipeout or the wave, and getting get involved constructively – that’s what we are try to do.”

Call it the “Pothole Theory” of local government — it always comes back to potholes, literally or figuratively.

“Potholes are not Democrats or Republicans, liberal or conservative, but that pothole does vote…so we’re focused on solutions. How do you fill the ‘pothole?’ How do you solve the problem?  That’s how you come up with very innovative solutions.”

(READ FULL STORY)

Enhanced by Zemanta
This entry was posted in Glendale-Burbank and tagged , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

5 Responses to The ‘pothole’ theory of solving a city’s problems — My Sunday Column

  1. see movies says:

    Article writing is also a fun, if you be familiar with after that you can write if not it is difficult to write.

  2. How to fill a pot hole. says:

    Step One: Kill the CRA or you won’t have money for Step 2

  3. Anonymous says:

    If redevelopment comes back, it needs to be limited ONLY to affordable housing. That’s it. We should not be subsidizing billionaires like Rick Caruso and that is how redevelopment agencies were corrupted.
    The marketplace has failures with respect to affordable housing and THAT is a legitimate area in which to spend tax increment. And even if it does come back, the funding must only go to afforable housing developers where executive compensation does not exceed a certain metric. We do not need to be in the business of subsidizing corrupt non-profits either — and there are plenty of those out there as well.
    Retail centers, sports arena, stadiums, golf courses, and similar projects should stand or fall on their merits and what the market will privately fund.

  4. Anonymous says:

    why do people who need affordable housing need
    to live in one of the priciest areas in the
    country?
    And if affordable housing is so costly, is that why the unions and builders and investors
    so insistent that we pay for it? They have money to invest. It is profitable somewhere along the line, but the profits are not availabler to the CRA to finance more.
    AAs a tax payer, I am bewildered.

  5. Eli Broad says:

    I HEART CRA! Good news you dissidents—I just closed escrow on Trutanich! I made an offer on Kevin James. I’m forclosing on Perry! Well gotta go!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>