Comment on this post

Balancing conflicting interests in water war — My Sunday Column

Don’t kid yourself, people will kill, or risk being killed, for just about anything of value. They’ll take that risk for money, for land, for gold, for diamonds — even for water.

Water, more than anything in our desert climate in Southern California, has long been at the heart of bloody fights, from the earliest days of settlement to “Chinatown” and the rape of the Owens Valley until today, when the water wars are only figuratively bloody. But a lot of people still get hurt.

Southern California’s latest water war escalated in the last week — sweeping in Burbank, Glendale, Pasadena and other nearby communities — when the San Diego Water Authority accused 20 of the 26 agencies that make up the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California of operating as a shadow government that calls itself the “Secret Society” and operates in the dark to its own advantage.

Last week, San Diego water officials released 500 emails that show how a clique of officials representing a majority of votes have met in secret 60 times over the last three years — an issue that has led to calls for an investigation by the state attorney general for violation of the state’s open meeting law.

The question San Diego posed at last Tuesday’s public meeting on this issue was whether the Metropolitan staff would offer a list of possible budget cuts before the vote next month on rate hikes of 7.5% next year and 5% the year after.

Water is a precious commodity these days, but Burbank wasn’t there to vote. Pasadena’s Timothy Brick voted to support the call for possible cuts in what many would say is a lot of questionable spending, and so did Glendale Mayor Laura Friedman.

“I’m always willing to look at cuts,” Friedman explained. “I believe all public organizations need to be looked at closely and transparently … I think we have a responsibility to the ratepayers.”

Drawing on Colorado River rights and Sacramento Delta supplies, Metropolitan provides half the water to the nearly 20 million people in six Southern California counties. It decides how much water is available, how much it costs, and manages a lot of less obvious rules that can save some agencies tens of millions of dollars a year — or, in the case of San Diego, cost them tens of millions.

How the rules and rates are set mostly depends on the Los Angeles Department of Water and Power and the MWD Orange County, which have 36% of the votes between them. That means they almost always are able to dictate policy — something that has led to disputes and lawsuits by San Diego, which provides 25% of Metropolitan’s revenue but rarely wins a battle.

By way of comparison, the Burbank, Glendale and Pasadena water agencies each only have 1% of the voting power and usually find their interests are more in line with L.A. than San Diego, so they have been included in the “Secret Society” where the decisions that matter are made.

(READ FULL STORY)

This entry was posted in Glendale-Burbank and tagged , . Bookmark the permalink.

One Response to Balancing conflicting interests in water war — My Sunday Column

  1. teddy says:

    Funny, I was just thinking about water. It is not our fault. Right now, people
    are drinking from the hundreds of thousands of plastic bottles the water that they buy in stores (Walmart, Ralphs, Costcxo, etc..)

    They do not even cash in on the deposit they pay on the bottles. Cannot be bothered.

    Is this what the secret meetings are discussing? How to make a lot of money on God’s gift to all? Just asking? Meetings are secret. Cynical? Yes, I admit it.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>