Comment on this post

My Sunday Column: Wishing PACs would pack it in — Mike Gatto and the Role of Outside Money in Burbank Elections

Just days before Burbank voters went to the polls, Mike Gatto was the star attraction for a Napa Valley retreat at a five-star hotel where, for $5,000 each, guests could schmooze with the assemblyman and four of his legislative pals.

The event was organized by Dan Weitzman, a Sacramento political consultant who was on Gatto’s campaign payroll for $3,000 a month the last two years and helped raise a $1-million campaign war chest for the assemblyman.

The beneficiary of the money raised at the retreat was a political action committee called Prosperity led by Weitzman with Stacey Brenner, Gatto’s political director, serving as a fundraising consultant.

Gatto has no role in Prosperity, Weitzman says, but critics suspect he is the central figure in a tangled web of political relationships that have brought at least three PACs into Burbank city elections where most candidates normally raise only a few thousand dollars, and special interests from outside rarely get involved.

It is a mystery filled with contradictions, but important to explore with school board and City Council control on the line in Burbank and the likelihood Glendale will also become a super PAC battleground.

Gatto’s role is particularly curious since he has so publicly and passionately pushed for a constitutional amendment to overturn the Supreme Court ruling that opened the door to unlimited special interest financing of campaigns through super PACs.

“Voters are fed up with the notion that money is speech and that big money can drown out the speech of average citizens,” Gatto declared last spring in introducing a joint resolution backing a constitutional amendment.

He introduced it again on the first day of the new session in December as Joint Resolution No. 1 to emphasize its importance.

Yet, his own political consultant, Sacramento-based Mike Shimpock, is the spokesman for a political action committee set up to defeat Councilman Jess Talamantes, supposedly over a bailout of the DeBell Golf Club and cuts in reserve officers. Shimpock denies any connection to Gatto in the PAC’s campaign, noting that his relationship with the union pre-dates working for the assemblyman.

The United Food and Commercial Workers Union couldn’t care less about golf or city finances, but it does want to keep Walmart out of Burbank and put up $20,000 — a huge sum in a local election — solely to beat Talamantes, although fellow council members David Gordon and Dave Golonski also supported approving the permits.

One anti-Talamantes mailer with a picture of a golfer and paramedics rushing someone into an emergency room asked: “What’s more important … Golf or your life?”

“I don’t know why they have gone after me, but I can’t help wondering who is behind this. There has to be somebody,” Talamantes says, as he rattles off endorsements from various unions and prominent city and Democratic politicians, including Gatto. “We’ve never seen anything like this before in Burbank.”

(READ FULL STORY at Glendale News-Press)

This entry was posted in 2013 Election, Glendale-Burbank, Hot Topics and tagged , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to My Sunday Column: Wishing PACs would pack it in — Mike Gatto and the Role of Outside Money in Burbank Elections

  1. Does this Gatto sleaze ball moved to LA so that he can run for the City Council?

  2. dealergatto says:

    Gatto is a joke. He used to deal drugs in college. Do some digging and find out the truth!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>