Judge David Yaffe threw out Las Lomas' $100 million lawsuit against L.A. Dan Palmer, the driving force behind the project, resigned as president of company. Hillary Orozco Norton, the firm's lobbyist, had moved from living off of overdevelopment that creates traffic congestion to living off the Measure R sales tax that's supposed to relieve traffic congestion.
Well, it was only a month ago. But tme flies and Las Lomas has appealed Yaffe's decision, presumably hoping L.A.'s money will provide the funding for the project when nobody's lending and nobody's buying homes.
"We believe our claims are meritorious and are convinced that there are fundamental legal issues that must be resolved by the Court of Appeal," said Carlyle W. Hall, Jr., counsel for Las Lomas.
"We were disappointed in the court's decision for ourselves, for the residents of Southern California, and for all those who recognize that the City Council broke the law. We are confident that the Court of Appeal will recognize that the City must answer for its illegal
decision to halt its review of the Las Lomas Project." Las Lomas Appeals Trial Court.doc