After the fact disclosures of what was going on behind the scenes is amusing but does nothing to enlighten or enhance the public debate.
In fact, the debate, such as it was. was all in private and, in the end, made no difference whatsoever.
The mayor whose sole actual achievement -- as opposed to greening LA, fixing the schools and building the subway to the sea which won't come to fruition for years -- is reducing crime. Of course, the real credit for that goes to Bratton.
With his public standing so low he can't run for governor, was the mayor really going to take the risk of choosing his own chief instead of Bratton's?
Joel Rubin in the Times tells us the mayor actually paid attention to the question over the weekend after the Police Commission had recommended Michel Moore, Jim McDonnell ahead of Beck.
Moore, the Valley chief, is smart, studied hard in Bratton's school of police and hard-working to the point his subordinates call him Micro-Mike. He was the star of the auditions and his performance appear to have forced the mayor into the uncomfortable position of thinking about his choice rather than just doing what Bratton told him.
McDonnell, the LAPD's No. 2 cop, has the most experience, actually was running the department during Bratton's many absences and was far and away the most popular choice with the public and police.
But it was always Beck's job because he was Bratton's choice.
"I was certain Bratton's endorsement would be crucial. But he went too far. He became an albatross," someone closely involved in the selection process told the Times.
Really, Bratton went too far? Hard to believe since he went as far as he wanted whenever he wanted for the last seven years.
The real question now is who's chief is he? Bratton's? The mayor's? The LAPD's?
Beck has a tough act to follow.